ArticleWorld journal of urology2015
Outcomes of two different incision techniques for surgical treatment of stress urinary incontinence with concomitant anterior vaginal wall prolapse.
Article in World journal of urology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Double sling with polyvinylidene fluoride implant: Evaluation of functional and anatomical outcomes of concomitant retropubic sling and anterior vaginal wall prolapse repair.Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · 2025Article
- Transobturator four arms mesh in the surgical management of stress urinary incontinence with cystocele.Turkish journal of urology · 2017Article
- A sequential comparison of postoperative voiding function between two different transobturator sling procedures.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du CanadaArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo assess the outcomes of two different incision techniques used in the surgical treatment of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) with concomitant anterior vaginal wall prolapse and to identify possible associated risk factors with a medium-term follow-up in patients who underwent TOT procedure.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study of 233 women who underwent transobturator tape procedure with cystocele repair. The women were divided into two groups according to two different incision techniques. The outcomes were analyzed considering five postoperative parameters: objective cure, subjective cure, patient satisfaction, resolution of urgency urinary incontinence and complications. The mean follow-up period was 43.6 months (range 12-85).
resultsA total of 226 women were documented in this study: 79 women in single-incision technique (group 1) and 147 women in double-incision technique (group 2). The objective and subjective cure and patient satisfaction (visual analog scale score ≥80) rates were 89.8, 73.4, 84.8 % and 90.4, 74.1, 86.4 % in group 1 and group 2, respectively. Complications reported according to the Clavien-Dindo classification were grade I 5.2 %, grade II 42.1 %, grade IIIa 47.3 %, and grade IIIb 5.2 %, and grade I 22.2 %, grade II 77.7 %, grade IIIa 0 % and grade IIIb 0 % in group 1 and group 2, respectively. The mean operative time was significantly shorter in group 1 compared to group 2 (p = 0.001).
conclusionsBoth incision techniques have satisfactory outcomes in the surgical treatment of SUI with cystocele; nevertheless, the postoperative complications favor the double-incision technique.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.