Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25173690›Full record

ReviewCurrent diabetes reports2014

Famines in the last 100 years: implications for diabetes.

Susanne R de Rooij, Tessa J Roseboom, Rebecca C Painter

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current diabetes reports, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Early life programming of health and disease: The long-term consequences of obesity in pregnancy.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2022
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. POMC Neurons: From Birth to Death.Annual review of physiology · 2017
    Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Susanne R de RooijDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Biostatistics & Bioinformatics, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, s.r.derooij@amc.uva.nl.
Tessa J Roseboom
Rebecca C Painter
University of Amsterdam · NLAcademic Medical Center · NL

Funding

Medical Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Overnutrition is a major cause of diabetes. The contrary situation of undernutrition has also been suggested to increase the risk of the disease. Especially undernutrition during prenatal life has been hypothesized to program the structure and physiology of the fetus in such a way that it is more prone to develop diabetes in later life. Famines over the last 100 years have provided historical opportunities to study later-life health consequences of poor nutritional circumstances in early life. The majority of studies based on famine exposure during prenatal life clearly show that diabetes risk is increased. Postnatal famine exposure in childhood, adolescence, or young adulthood also seems to raise risk for diabetes, although prenatal famine effects seem to be more substantial. These study results not only have implications for the consequences of famines still happening but also for pregnancies complicated by factors mimicking poor nutritional situations.

Indexed as

AdolescentChildChild, PreschoolFemaleFetal DevelopmentHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInfant Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaMaternal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaPlacental InsufficiencyPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsPrenatal Exposure Delayed EffectsRisk AssessmentStarvation

Identifiers

PMID25173690
OpenAlexW2033063191

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.