Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25173562›Full record

ReviewEuropean biophysics journal : EBJ2014

Recent progress in the study of the interactions of amphotericin B with cholesterol and ergosterol in lipid environments.

Daniel Michał Kamiński

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European biophysics journal : EBJ, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 75 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
75citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

75 citing papers in PubMed, 176 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Deciphering the multidrug resistance paradigm inAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. TheIranian journal of pathology · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

15 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Daniel Michał KamińskiDepartment of Chemistry, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Akademicka 15, 20-950, Lublin, Poland, daniel_kaminski3@wp.pl.
University of Life Sciences in Lublin · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the past decade substantial progress has been made in understanding the organization and biological activity of amphotericin B (AmB) in the presence of sterols in lipid environments. This review concentrates mainly on interactions of AmB with lipids and sterols, AmB channel formation in membranes, AmB aggregation, AmB modifications important for understanding its biological activity, and AmB models explaining its mechanism of action. Most of the reviewed studies concern monolayers at the water-gas interface, monolayers deposited on a solid substrate by use of the Langmuir-Blodgett technique, micelles, vesicles, and multi-bilayers. Liposomal AmB formulations and drug delivery are intentionally omitted, because several reviews dedicated to this subject are already available.

Indexed as

Amphotericin BCholesterolErgosterolLipid BilayersMembrane MicrodomainsAmphotericin BCholesterolErgosterolLipid Bilayers

Identifiers

PMID25173562
PMCPMC4212203
OpenAlexW1970934950

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.