Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25173357›Full record

Trial reportPediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany)2015

Antibiotic prophylaxis in the management of vesicoureteric reflux: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial.

Pankaj Hari, Smriti Hari, Aditi Sinha, Rakesh Kumar, Arti Kapil, Ravindra Mohan Pandey, Arvind Bagga

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Interventions for primary vesicoureteric reflux.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Outcomes in children with vesicoureteral reflux receiving antibiotic prophylaxis.Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2025
    Article
  9. Impact of antibiotic prophylaxis on urinary tract infection recurrence in children Rapid review.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2024
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Vesicoureteral reflux is it important to find?Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2021
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Urinary tract infections in children.Lancet (London, England) · 2020
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Antimicrobial Pharmacotherapy Management of Urinary Tract Infections in Pediatric Patients.The Journal of pharmacy technology : jPT : official publication of the Association of Pharmacy Technicians · 2018
    Review
  20. The RIVUR study: a review of its findings.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Pankaj HariDepartment of Pediatrics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, 110029, India, pankajhari@hotmail.com.
Smriti Hari
Aditi Sinha
Rakesh Kumar
Arti Kapil
Ravindra Mohan Pandey
Arvind Bagga
All India Institute of Medical Sciences · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe benefits of long-term low-dose antibiotics in preventing urinary tract infection (UTI) and renal damage in children with primary vesicoureteric reflux (VUR) are unclear.

methodsChildren aged between 1 and 12 years with VUR grade I-IV and a microbiologically proven UTI were randomized into two groups to receive either antibiotic prophylaxis [2 mg/kg trimethoprim + sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX)] daily or placebo, respectively, for 12 months. Primary outcome was microbiologically confirmed symptomatic UTI. Intention-to-treat analysis using time-to-event data was performed.

resultsA total of 93 children (66.7 % boys) with a median age of 4.6 years were enrolled in this study; VUR grade III-IV was present in 73.1 % of these children. At least one symptomatic UTI occurred in ten (21.3 %) patients receiving antibiotic prophylaxis and in three (6.5 %) patients receiving placebo [hazard ratio in antibiotic group 3.9; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1- 14; log rank test P = 0.02). Compared to the group receiving placebo, the antibiotic group had a 14.8 % increased risk for developing UTI (95 % CI 1-28; P = 0.03). Of the total number of episodes of UTI, 58.3 % of those in the antibiotic group were caused by TMP-SMX-resistant bacteria compared to 20 % in the placebo group (P = 0.15). A renal scan at 12 months revealed that six of 37 (16.2 %) patients in the antibiotic group and seven of 43 (16.3 %) patients in the placebo group had new or worsening of pre-existing scar.

conclusionsLong-term antibiotic prophylaxis with TMP-SMX is associated with increased risk of symptomatic UTI compared to placebo in children with grade I-IV VUR.

Indexed as

Anti-Infective Agents, UrinaryChemopreventionChildChild, PreschoolDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansInfantMaleTrimethoprim, Sulfamethoxazole Drug CombinationUrinary Tract InfectionsVesico-Ureteral RefluxAnti-Infective Agents, UrinaryTrimethoprim, Sulfamethoxazole Drug Combination

Identifiers

PMID25173357
OpenAlexW1969053777

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.