ArticleJournal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics2014
Computational pharmacology of rifampin in mice: an application to dose optimization with conflicting objectives in tuberculosis treatment.
Article in Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pretomanid dose selection for pulmonary tuberculosis: An application of multi-objective optimization to dosage regimen design.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2021Trial
- Optimal design of dose and drug pharmacokinetic characteristics to achieve the desired pharmacodynamic profile in repeated drug dosing.PloS one · 2026Article
- Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Modeling and Application in Antibacterial and Antifungal Pharmacotherapy: A Narrative Review.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Modeling and Simulation of Pretomanid Pharmacodynamics in Pulmonary Tuberculosis Patients.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2019Article
- A quantitative systems pharmacology (QSP) model for Pneumocystis treatment in mice.BMC systems biology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Dose selection for rifampin in the treatment of active pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) illustrates some of the challenges for dose optimization within multidrug therapies. Rifampin-based anti-TB regimens are often combined with antiretroviral therapies to treat human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) coinfection. The potent cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzyme inducing properties of rifampin give rise to significant drug-drug interactions, the minimization of which by limiting the dose, conflicts with the maximization of bacterial killing by increasing the dose. Such multiple and conflicting objectives lead to a set of trade-off optimal solutions for dose optimization rather than a single best solution. Here, we combine pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) modeling with multiobjective optimization to quantitatively explore trade-offs between therapeutic and adverse effects of optimal dosing for the example of rifampin in TB-infected mice. The PK/PD model describes rifampin concentrations in plasma and liver following oral administration together with hepatic CYP enzyme induction and bacterial killing kinetics. We include optimization objectives descriptive of antimicrobial efficacy, CYP-mediated drug-drug interactions, and drug exposure-dependent toxicity. Results show non-conventional dosing scenarios that allow for increased efficacy relative to uniform dosing without increasing drug-drug interactions. Additionally, we find currently employed dosages for rifampin to be nearly optimal with respect to trade-offs between efficacy and toxicity. While limited by the accuracy and applicability of the PK/PD model, these results provide an avenue for experimental investigation of complex dose optimization problems. This method can be extended to include additional drugs and optimization objectives, and may provide a useful tool for individualized medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.