Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25173068›Full record

ArticleUltrasonics2015

An analysis of the segmentation threshold used in axial-shear strain elastography.

Arun K Thittai, Rongmin Xia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ultrasonics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Arun K ThittaiThe University of Texas Medical School, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging, Ultrasonics Laboratory, Houston, TX, USA. Electronic address: AKThittai@iitm.ac.in.
Rongmin XiaThe University of Texas Medical School, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging, Ultrasonics Laboratory, Houston, TX, USA.

Funding

Axial Shear Strain Elastography In Benign and Malignant Breast DiseaseR21CA153373 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI OPHIR, JONATHAN · 2011 to 2012
$613k
JOphir R21 Imaging the Shear Strain at BreastR21CA135580 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI OPHIR, JONATHAN · 2008 to 2009
$371k
NCI NIH HHS R21 CA135580NCI NIH HHS R21-CA135580-01NCI NIH HHS R21 CA153373
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Axial-shear strain elastography was introduced recently to image the tumor-host tissue boundary bonding characteristics. The image depicting the axial-shear strain distribution in a tissue under axial compression was termed as an axial-shear strain elastogram (ASSE). It has been demonstrated through simulation, tissue-mimicking phantom experiments, and retrospective analysis of in vivo breast lesion data that metrics quantifying the pattern of axial-shear strain distribution on ASSE can be used as features for identifying the lesion boundary condition as loosely-bonded or firmly-bonded. Consequently, features from ASSE have been shown to have potential in non-invasive breast lesion classification into benign versus malignant. Although there appears to be a broad concurrence in the results reported by different groups, important details pertaining to the appropriate segmentation threshold needed for - (1) displaying the ASSE as a color-overlay on top of corresponding Axial Strain Elastogram (ASE) and/or sonogram for feature visualization and (2) ASSE feature extraction are not yet fully addressed. In this study, we utilize ASSE from tissue mimicking phantom (with loosely-bonded and firmly-bonded inclusions) experiments and freehand - acquired in vivo breast lesion data (7 benign and 9 malignant) to analyze the effect of segmentation threshold on ASSE feature value, specifically, the "fill-in" feature that was introduced recently. We varied the segmentation threshold from 20% to 70% (of the maximum ASSE value) for each frame of the acquisition cine-loop of every data and computed the number of ASSE pixels within the lesion that was greater than or equal to this threshold value. If at least 40% of the pixels within the lesion area crossed this segmentation threshold, the ASSE frame was considered to demonstrate a "fill-in" that would indicate a loosely-bonded lesion boundary condition (suggestive of a benign lesion). Otherwise, the ASSE frame was considered not to demonstrate a "fill-in" indicating a firmly-bonded lesion boundary condition (suggestive of a malignant lesion). The results demonstrate that in the case of in vivo breast lesion data the appropriate range for the segmentation threshold value seems to be 40-60%. It was noted that for a segmentation threshold within this range (for example, at 50%) all of the analyzed breast lesion cases can be correctly classified into benign and malignant, based on the percentage number of frames within the acquisition cine-loop that demonstrate a "fill-in".

Indexed as

Shear StrengthBreast NeoplasmsElasticity Imaging TechniquesHumansPhantoms, ImagingAxial–shear strainBenignElastographyMalignantSegmentation threshold

Identifiers

PMID25173068
PMCPMC4185333

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.