Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25172955›Full record

ArticleMolecular & cellular proteomics : MCP2014

A pipeline for determining protein-protein interactions and proximities in the cellular milieu.

Roman I Subbotin, Brian T Chait

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The many faces of the GID/CTLH E3 ligase complex.Biochemical Society transactions · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Proximity Labeling in Plants.Annual review of plant biology · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. MeasuringSTAR protocols · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Roman I SubbotinFrom the ‡The Rockefeller University 1230 York Ave, New York, New York.
Brian T ChaitFrom the ‡The Rockefeller University 1230 York Ave, New York, New York chait@rockefeller.edu.

Funding

TR&D Project 4. The Imaging Stage: Multiscale Spatiotemporal Modeling of Macromolecular Systems in Cellular NeighborhoodsP41GM109824 · NIGMS · ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY · PI ROUT, MICHAEL P · 2014 to 2023
$18.8M
National Resource for Mass Spectrom of Biological MacromoleculesP41GM103314 · NIGMS · ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY · PI CHAIT, BRIAN T · 2012 to 2017
$9.9M
New Tools for Exploring the Dynamic Interactome (Renewal)U54GM103511 · NIGMS · ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY · PI ROUT, MICHAEL P · 2012 to 2013
$6.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS P41 GM103314NIGMS NIH HHS P41 GM109824NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM103511
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It remains extraordinarily challenging to elucidate endogenous protein-protein interactions and proximities within the cellular milieu. The dynamic nature and the large range of affinities of these interactions augment the difficulty of this undertaking. Among the most useful tools for extracting such information are those based on affinity capture of target bait proteins in combination with mass spectrometric readout of the co-isolated species. Although highly enabling, the utility of affinity-based methods is generally limited by difficulties in distinguishing specific from nonspecific interactors, preserving and isolating all unique interactions including those that are weak, transient, or rapidly exchanging, and differentiating proximal interactions from those that are more distal. Here, we have devised and optimized a set of methods to address these challenges. The resulting pipeline involves flash-freezing cells in liquid nitrogen to preserve the cellular environment at the moment of freezing; cryomilling to fracture the frozen cells into intact micron chunks to allow for rapid access of a chemical reagent and to stabilize the intact endogenous subcellular assemblies and interactors upon thawing; and utilizing the high reactivity of glutaraldehyde to achieve sufficiently rapid stabilization at low temperatures to preserve native cellular interactions. In the course of this work, we determined that relatively low molar ratios of glutaraldehyde to reactive amines within the cellular milieu were sufficient to preserve even labile and transient interactions. This mild treatment enables efficient and rapid affinity capture of the protein assemblies of interest under nondenaturing conditions, followed by bottom-up MS to identify and quantify the protein constituents. For convenience, we have termed this approach Stabilized Affinity Capture Mass Spectrometry. Here, we demonstrate that Stabilized Affinity Capture Mass Spectrometry allows us to stabilize and elucidate local, distant, and transient protein interactions within complex cellular milieux, many of which are not observed in the absence of chemical stabilization.

Indexed as

CryopreservationGlutaralMass SpectrometryNuclear Pore Complex ProteinsProtein BindingProtein Interaction MappingProteomicsSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsGlutaralNuclear Pore Complex ProteinsNUP84 protein, S cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins

Identifiers

PMID25172955
PMCPMC4223475

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.