Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25172951›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of physiology2014

Ionotropic GABA and glycine receptor subunit composition in human pluripotent stem cell-derived excitatory cortical neurones.

Owain T James, Matthew R Livesey, Jing Qiu, Owen Dando, Bilada Bilican, Ghazal Haghi, Rinku Rajan, Karen Burr, Giles E Hardingham, Siddharthan Chandran and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of physiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Owain T JamesCentre for Integrative Physiology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH8 9XD, UK Centre for Brain Development and Repair, Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, National Centre for Biological Sciences, Bangalore, 560065, India Euan MacDonald Centre for MND Research, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH16 4SB, UK.
Matthew R LiveseyCentre for Integrative Physiology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH8 9XD, UK Euan MacDonald Centre for MND Research, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH16 4SB, UK.
Jing QiuCentre for Integrative Physiology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH8 9XD, UK.
Owen DandoCentre for Integrative Physiology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH8 9XD, UK Centre for Brain Development and Repair, Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, National Centre for Biological Sciences, Bangalore, 560065, India.
Bilada BilicanEuan MacDonald Centre for MND Research, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH16 4SB, UK Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH16 4SB, UK MRC Centre for Regenerative Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH16 4SB, UK.
Ghazal HaghiCentre for Integrative Physiology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH8 9XD, UK Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH16 4SB, UK.
Rinku RajanCentre for Integrative Physiology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH8 9XD, UK Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH16 4SB, UK.
Karen BurrEuan MacDonald Centre for MND Research, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH16 4SB, UK Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH16 4SB, UK MRC Centre for Regenerative Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH16 4SB, UK.
Giles E HardinghamCentre for Integrative Physiology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH8 9XD, UK Patrick Wild Centre, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH8 9XD, UK.
Siddharthan ChandranCentre for Brain Development and Repair, Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, National Centre for Biological Sciences, Bangalore, 560065, India Euan MacDonald Centre for MND Research, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH16 4SB, UK Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH16 4SB, UK MRC Centre for Regenerative Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH16 4SB, UK.
Peter C KindCentre for Integrative Physiology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH8 9XD, UK Centre for Brain Development and Repair, Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, National Centre for Biological Sciences, Bangalore, 560065, India Patrick Wild Centre, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH8 9XD, UK.
David J A WyllieCentre for Integrative Physiology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH8 9XD, UK Patrick Wild Centre, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH8 9XD, UK dwyllie1@staffmail.ed.ac.uk.
University of Edinburgh · GBMRC Centre for Regenerative Medicine · GBInstitute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine · INNational Centre for Biological Sciences · IN

Funding

Medical Research Council G0902044Medical Research Council MR/J004367/1Medical Research Council MR/K014137/1National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research NC/C011202/1Wellcome Trust 092742/Z/10/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We have assessed, using whole-cell patch-clamp recording and RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq), the properties and composition of GABAA receptors (GABAARs) and strychnine-sensitive glycine receptors (GlyRs) expressed by excitatory cortical neurons derived from human embryonic stem cells (hECNs). The agonists GABA and muscimol gave EC50 values of 278 μm and 182 μm, respectively, and the presence of a GABAAR population displaying low agonist potencies is supported by strong RNA-seq signals for α2 and α3 subunits. GABAAR-mediated currents, evoked by EC50 concentrations of GABA, were blocked by bicuculline and picrotoxin with IC50 values of 2.7 and 5.1 μm, respectively. hECN GABAARs are predominantly γ subunit-containing as assessed by the sensitivity of GABA-evoked currents to diazepam and insensitivity to Zn(2+), together with the weak direct agonist action of gaboxadol; RNA-seq indicated a predominant expression of the γ2 subunit. Potentiation of GABA-evoked currents by propofol and etomidate and the lack of inhibition of currents by salicylidine salycylhydrazide (SCS) indicate expression of the β2 or β3 subunit, with RNA-seq analysis indicating strong expression of β3 in hECN GABAARs. Taken together our data support the notion that hECN GABAARs have an α2/3β3γ2 subunit composition - a composition that also predominates in immature rodent cortex. GlyRs expressed by hECNs were activated by glycine with an EC50 of 167 μm. Glycine-evoked (500 μm) currents were blocked by strychnine (IC50 = 630 nm) and picrotoxin (IC50 = 197 μm), where the latter is suggestive of a population of heteromeric receptors. RNA-seq indicates GlyRs are likely to be composed of α2 and β subunits.

Indexed as

Cerebral Cortexgamma-Aminobutyric AcidHumansMuscimolNeuronsPluripotent Stem CellsProtein SubunitsReceptors, GABA-AReceptors, Glycinegamma-Aminobutyric AcidMuscimolProtein SubunitsReceptors, GABA-AReceptors, Glycine

Identifiers

PMID25172951
PMCPMC4215781
OpenAlexW1502442875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.