Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25172871›Full record

ArticleCancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology2014

The cytokinesis-blocked micronucleus assay as a strong predictor of lung cancer: extension of a lung cancer risk prediction model.

Randa A El-Zein, Mirtha S Lopez, Anthony M D'Amelio, Mei Liu, Reginald F Munden, David Christiani, Li Su, Paula Tejera-Alveraz, Rihong Zhai, Margaret R Spitz and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. [Construction of a Risk Prediction Model for Lung Cancer Based on Lifestyle Behaviors in the UK Biobank Large-Scale Population Cohort].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Therapeutic effects of statins on chromosomal DNA damage of dyslipidemic patients.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Should Never-Smokers at Increased Risk for Lung Cancer Be Screened?Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Randa A El-ZeinDepartment of Epidemiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas. relzein@mdanderson.org.
Mirtha S LopezDepartment of Epidemiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Anthony M D'AmelioDepartment of Epidemiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Mei LiuDepartment of Epidemiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas. CORRONA, Inc., Southborough, Massachusetts.
Reginald F MundenDiagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas. Houston Methodist, Houston, Texas.
David ChristianiDepartment of Environmental Health, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Li SuDepartment of Environmental Health, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Paula Tejera-AlverazDepartment of Environmental Health, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Rihong ZhaiDepartment of Environmental Health, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Margaret R SpitzDan L. Duncan Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Carol J EtzelDepartment of Epidemiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas. CORRONA, Inc., Southborough, Massachusetts.

Funding

Pilot Project ProgramP30ES007784 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI RICHIE, ELLEN R · 1996 to 2011
$16.4M
Molecular and Genetic Analysis of Lung Cancer SurvivalR01CA092824 · NCI · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (SCH OF PUBLIC HLTH) · PI CHRISTIANI, DAVID C · 2002 to 2013
$5.9M
ECOGENETIC STUDY OF LUNG CANCER IN MINORITIESR01CA055769 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI SPITZ, MARGARET R · 1991 to 2008
$5.3M
Validation and extension of an existing risk model for lung cancerR01CA131327 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI EL-ZEIN, RANDA A · 2009 to 2010
$1.4M
Cytokinesis-blocked micronucleus assay: a predictive biomarker of lung cancer risR21CA129050 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI EL-ZEIN, RANDA A · 2008 to 2009
$381k
NCI NIH HHS CA055769NCI NIH HHS CA092824NCI NIH HHS CA129050NCI NIH HHS R01 CA055769NCI NIH HHS R01 CA092824NCI NIH HHS R01 CA131327NCI NIH HHS R21 CA129050NIEHS NIH HHS ES007784NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES007784
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is an urgent need to improve lung cancer outcome by identifying and validating markers of risk. We previously reported that the cytokinesis-blocked micronucleus assay (CBMN) is a strong predictor of lung cancer risk. Here, we validate our findings in an independent external lung cancer population and test discriminatory power improvement of the Spitz risk prediction model upon extension with this biomarker.

methodsA total of 1,506 participants were stratified into a test set of 995 (527 cases/468 controls) from MD Anderson Cancer Center (Houston, TX) and a validation set of 511 (239 cases/272 controls) from Massachusetts General Hospital (Boston, MA). An epidemiologic questionnaire was administered and genetic instability was assessed using the CBMN assay.

resultsExcellent concordance was observed between the two populations in levels and distribution of CBMN endpoints [binucleated-micronuclei (BN-MN), binucleated-nucleoplasmic bridges (BN-NPB)] with significantly higher mean BN-MN and BN-NPB values among cases (P < 0.0001). Extension of the Spitz model led to an overall improvement in the AUC (95% confidence intervals) from 0.61 (55.5-65.7) with epidemiologic variables to 0.92 (89.4-94.2) with addition of the BN-MN endpoint. The most dramatic improvement was observed with the never-smokers extended model followed by the former and current smokers.

conclusionsThe CBMN assay is a sensitive and specific predictor of lung cancer risk, and extension of the Spitz risk prediction model led to an AUC that may prove useful in population screening programs to identify the "true" high-risk individuals. IMPACT: Identifying high-risk subgroups that would benefit from screening surveillance has immense public health significance.

Indexed as

CytokinesisFemaleHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID25172871
PMCPMC4487661

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.