ArticleDevelopmental biology2014
Co-regulation of invected and engrailed by a complex array of regulatory sequences in Drosophila.
Article in Developmental biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.
- Predicting enhancer-gene links from single-cell multi-omics data by integrating prior Hi-C information.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- Article
- Conserved roles of engrailed: patterning tissues and specifying cell types.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2024Review
- Polycomb protein binding and looping in the ON transcriptional state.Science advances · 2024Article
- Polycomb protein binding and looping mediated by Polycomb Response Elements in the ON transcriptional state.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- The activity of engrailed imaginal disc enhancers is modulated epigenetically by chromatin and autoregulation.PLoS genetics · 2023Article
- Interlocking of co-opted developmental gene networks in Drosophila and the evolution of pre-adaptive novelty.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Context-dependent role of Pho binding sites in Polycomb complex recruitment in Drosophila.Genetics · 2023Article
- Functional Divergence of theInsects · 2023Article
- Divergent expression of aristaless1 and aristaless2 during embryonic appendage and pupal wing development in butterflies.BMC biology · 2023Article
- The roles of growth regulation and appendage patterning genes in the morphogenesis of treehopper pronota.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2022Article
- Article
- A shared ancient enhancer element differentially regulates the bric-a-brac tandem gene duplicates in the developing Drosophila leg.PLoS genetics · 2022Article
- The Hippo pathway coactivator Yorkie can reprogram cell fates and create compartment-boundary-like interactions at clone margins.Science advances · 2020Article
- Defining the Boundaries of Polycomb Domains inGenetics · 2020Article
- Mimicry diversification inProceedings. Biological sciences · 2020Article
- Article
- Article
- Gene activation by dCas9-CBP and the SAM system differ in target preference.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Structure and function of an ectopic Polycomb chromatin domain.Science advances · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
invected (inv) and engrailed (en) form a gene complex that extends about 115 kb. These two genes encode highly related homeodomain proteins that are co-regulated in a complex manner throughout development. Our dissection of inv/en regulatory DNA shows that most enhancers are spread throughout a 62 kb region. We used two types of constructs to analyze the function of this DNA: P-element based reporter constructs with small pieces of DNA fused to the en promoter driving lacZ expression and large constructs with HA-tagged en and inv inserted in the genome with the phiC31 system. In addition, we generated deletions of inv and en DNA in situ and assayed their effects on inv/en expression. Our results support and extend our knowledge of inv/en regulation. First, inv and en share regulatory DNA, most of which is flanking the en transcription unit. In support of this, a 79-kb HA-en transgene can rescue inv en double mutants to viable, fertile adults. In contrast, an 84-kb HA-inv transgene lacks most of the enhancers for inv/en expression. Second, there are multiple enhancers for inv/en stripes in embryos; some of these may be redundant but others play discrete roles at different stages of embryonic development. Finally, no small reporter construct gave expression in the posterior compartment of imaginal discs, a hallmark of inv/en expression. Robust expression of HA-en in the posterior compartment of imaginal discs is evident from the 79-kb HA-en transgene, while a 45-kb HA-en transgene gives weaker, variable imaginal disc expression. We suggest that the activity of the imaginal disc enhancer(s) is dependent on the chromatin structure of the inv/en domain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.