Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25171890›Full record

ArticleTranslational oncology2014

Phase I trial of radiotherapy concurrent with twice-weekly gemcitabine for head and neck cancer: translation from preclinical investigations aiming to improve the therapeutic ratio.

Aron Popovtzer, Daniel Normolle, Francis P Worden, Mark E Prince, Douglas B Chepeha, Gregory T Wolf, Carol R Bradford, Theodore S Lawrence, Avraham Eisbruch

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational oncology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Aron PopovtzerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan Hospital, Ann Arbor, MI.
Daniel NormolleDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan Hospital, Ann Arbor, MI; Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan Hospital, Ann Arbor, MI.
Francis P WordenDepartment of Medicine, University of Michigan Hospital, Ann Arbor, MI.
Mark E PrinceDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head neck Surgery, University of Michigan Hospital, Ann Arbor, MI.
Douglas B ChepehaDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head neck Surgery, University of Michigan Hospital, Ann Arbor, MI.
Gregory T WolfDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head neck Surgery, University of Michigan Hospital, Ann Arbor, MI.
Carol R BradfordDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head neck Surgery, University of Michigan Hospital, Ann Arbor, MI.
Theodore S LawrenceDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan Hospital, Ann Arbor, MI.
Avraham EisbruchDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan Hospital, Ann Arbor, MI. Electronic address: eisbruch@umich.edu.
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

VECTOR CORE FACILITYP30CA047904 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Jessie Nedrow · 1988 to 2026
$158.0M
Mechanism-Based Use of Chk1 Inhibitors in Pancreas CancerR01CA138723 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI LAWRENCE, THEODORE S, MAYBAUM, JONATHAN · 2010 to 2015
$2.0M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA047904NCI NIH HHS R01 CA138723
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOnce-weekly gemcitabine concurrent with radiotherapy was highly effective in the treatment of head and neck cancer (HNC) but limited by high mucosal toxicity. Pre-clinical investigations suggested that delivering gemcitabine at substantially lower doses twice weekly during radiotherapy improved the therapeutic ratio. We sought to translated these preclinical findings to a phase I trial.

methodsTwenty-five patients with non-resectable HNC were scheduled to receive gemcitabine twice weekly during the last 2 weeks (total 5 infusions) of hyperfractionated radiotherapy delivering 1.2 Gy twice daily to total 76.8 Gy. Tumor biopsies to measure active intracellular (phosphorylated) gemcitabine were planned after the first drug delivery. Patients were assigned to escalating dose cohorts using the Continuous Reassessment Method.

resultsTwenty-one patients evaluable for toxicity were divided into cohorts receiving twice weekly treatment with 10, 20, 33, or 50 mg/m(2) gemcitabine. Dose-limiting toxicity was grade 3-4 confluent mucositis/pharyngitis, and the maximally tolerated dose (MTD) was 20 mg/m(2). Median survival was 20 months, with no difference between cohorts receiving lower (10, 20 mg/m(2)) or higher (33, 50 mg/m(2)) gemcitabine doses. Tumor biopsies after the first drug delivery showed only a minority of tumor cells in the specimens.

conclusionThese findings validate preclinical models that show that gemcitabine is radiation sensitizer at doses far below those used for systemic chemotherapy. However, the improvement in the therapeutic ratio predicted from the preclinical study did not translate into a substantial relative increase in the MTD of the drug in the clinical phase I trial.

Identifiers

PMID25171890
PMCPMC4202797
OpenAlexW2058168633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.