Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25171546›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of the medical sciences2014

Mast cell activation syndrome as a significant comorbidity in sickle cell disease.

Lawrence B Afrin

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of the medical sciences, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Mast Cell Activation Syndrome.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2018
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Inflammatory targets of therapy in sickle cell disease.Translational research : the journal of laboratory and clinical medicine · 2016
    Review
  8. Mast Cell-Mediated Mechanisms of Nociception.International journal of molecular sciences · 2015
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lawrence B AfrinDivision of Hematology, Oncology & Transplantation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
University of Minnesota · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Some sickle cell anemia (SCA) patients suffer significantly worse phenotypes than others. Causes of such disparities are incompletely understood. Comorbid chronic inflammation likely is a factor. Recently, mast cell (MC) activation (creating an inflammatory state) was found to be a significant factor in sickle pathobiology and pain in a murine SCA model. Also, a new realm of relatively noncytoproliferative MC disease termed MC activation syndrome (MCAS) has been identified recently. MCAS has not previously been described in SCA. Some SCA patients experience pain patterns and other morbidities more congruent with MCAS than traditional SCA pathobiology (eg, vasoocclusion). Presented here are 32 poor-phenotype SCA patients who met MCAS diagnostic criteria; all improved with MCAS-targeted therapy. As hydroxyurea benefits some MCAS patients (particularly SCA-like pain), its benefit in SCA may be partly attributable to treatment of unrecognized MCAS. Further study will better characterize MCAS in SCA and identify optimal therapy.

Indexed as

AdultAnemia, Sickle CellAntisickling AgentsCaseinsChromogranin ACohort StudiesFemaleHeparinHistamineHumansHydroxyureaInflammationMaleMastocytosisMethylhistaminesMiddle AgedAntisickling AgentsCaseinsChromogranin AHeparinHistamineHydroxyureaMethylhistaminesN-methylhistamineProstaglandin D2Protein Hydrolysatestrypticase-soy broth

Identifiers

PMID25171546
PMCPMC4242119
OpenAlexW2093860048

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.