Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25171119›Full record

Trial reportSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2014

Clinical evaluation of a mobile sensor-based gait analysis method for outcome measurement after knee arthroplasty.

Tilman Calliess, Raphael Bocklage, Roman Karkosch, Michael Marschollek, Henning Windhagen, Mareike Schulze

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Acceleration Gait Measures as Proxies for Motor Skill of Walking: A Narrative Review.IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tilman CalliessDepartment for Orthopaedic Surgery at the Annastift, Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany. tilman.calliess@ddh-gruppe.de.
Raphael BocklageDepartment for Orthopaedic Surgery at the Annastift, Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany. raphael.bocklage@gmail.com.
Roman KarkoschDepartment for Orthopaedic Surgery at the Annastift, Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany. roman_karkosch@web.de.
Michael MarschollekHannover Medical School, Peter L. Reichertz Institute for Medical Informatics, University of Braunschweig-Institute of Technology and Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany. michael.marschollek@plri.de.
Henning WindhagenDepartment for Orthopaedic Surgery at the Annastift, Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany. henning.windhagen@ddh-gruppe.de.
Mareike SchulzeHannover Medical School, Peter L. Reichertz Institute for Medical Informatics, University of Braunschweig-Institute of Technology and Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany. mareike.schulze@plri.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical scores and motion-capturing gait analysis are today's gold standard for outcome measurement after knee arthroplasty, although they are criticized for bias and their ability to reflect patients' actual quality of life has been questioned. In this context, mobile gait analysis systems have been introduced to overcome some of these limitations. This study used a previously developed mobile gait analysis system comprising three inertial sensor units to evaluate daily activities and sports. The sensors were taped to the lumbosacral junction and the thigh and shank of the affected limb. The annotated raw data was evaluated using our validated proprietary software. Six patients undergoing knee arthroplasty were examined the day before and 12 months after surgery. All patients reported a satisfactory outcome, although four patients still had limitations in their desired activities. In this context, feasible running speed demonstrated a good correlation with reported impairments in sports-related activities. Notably, knee flexion angle while descending stairs and the ability to stop abruptly when running exhibited good correlation with the clinical stability and proprioception of the knee. Moreover, fatigue effects were displayed in some patients. The introduced system appears to be suitable for outcome measurement after knee arthroplasty and has the potential to overcome some of the limitations of stationary gait labs while gathering additional meaningful parameters regarding the force limits of the knee.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, KneeGaitAccelerometryActigraphyAgedEquipment DesignEquipment Failure AnalysisFemaleHumansMagnetometryMaleMiddle AgedOsteoarthritis, KneeOutcome Assessment, Health CareTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID25171119
PMCPMC4208155

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.