Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25171095›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Variability of the pharyngeal phase of swallow in the cat.

Daniel G Spearman, Ivan Poliacek, Melanie J Rose, Donald C Bolser, Teresa Pitts

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Research advances in dysphagia animal models.Animal models and experimental medicine · 2025
    Review
  2. Serotonin therapies for opioid-induced disordered swallow and respiratory depression.Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985) · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Deglutition and the Regulation of the Swallow Motor Pattern.Physiology (Bethesda, Md.) · 2023 · on this map
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Daniel G SpearmanDepartment of Physiological Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America.
Ivan PoliacekDepartment of Physiological Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America; Institute of Medical Biophysics, Jessenius Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University, Martin, Slovak Republic.
Melanie J RoseDepartment of Physiological Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America.
Donald C BolserDepartment of Physiological Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America.
Teresa PittsDepartment of Physiological Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America.
University of Florida · US

Funding

Mechanisms of Swallow Control of BreathingR01HL109025 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI DAVENPORT, PAUL W, MORRIS, KENDALL FRANCIS · 2012 to 2015
$2.9M
Central Mechanisms of Airway ProtectionR01HL103415 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI BOLSER, DONALD C, DAVENPORT, PAUL W · 2010 to 2013
$2.2M
Neurogenesis of CoughR33HL089104 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI BOLSER, DONALD C · 2008 to 2010
$1.6M
Regulation of Airway Protective BehaviorsK99HL111215 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI PITTS, TERESA G · 2013 to 2014
$267k
NHLBI NIH HHS HL103415NHLBI NIH HHS HL107745NHLBI NIH HHS HL109025NHLBI NIH HHS HL 89104NHLBI NIH HHS K99 HL111215NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL103415NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL109025NHLBI NIH HHS R33 HL089104
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe pharyngeal phase of swallow has been thought to be a stereotypical motor behavior. STUDY

designThis is a prospective, preclinical, hypothesis driven, one group by three-task design.

methodsWe sought to compare the effects of pharyngeal swabbing, water only, and water plus punctate mechanical stimulation on the spatiotemporal features of the pharyngeal phase of swallow in the cat. Swallow was elicited under these three conditions in six anaesthetized cats. Electromyographic activity was recorded from seven muscles used to evaluate swallow: mylohyoid, geniohyoid, thyrohyoid, thyroarytenoid, thyropharyngeus, cricopharyngeus, and parasternal.

resultsPharyngeal swabbing in comparison to the other stimulus conditions, results in decreases in post-swallow cricopharyngeus activity (upper esophageal sphincter); a significant increase in parasternal (schluckatmung; swallow breath) activity; and increases in thyrohyoid (laryngeal elevator), thyroarytenoid (laryngeal adductor) and parasternal muscles burst duration. Pearson correlations were found of moderate strength between 19% of burst duration comparisons and weak to moderate relationships between 29% of burst amplitude comparisons. However, there were no positive significant relationships between phase durations and electromyogram amplitudes between any of the muscles studied during swallow.

conclusionsThe results support the concept that a stereotypical behavior, such as pharyngeal swallowing in animal models, can be modified by sensory feedback from pharyngeal mucosal mechanoreceptors. Furthermore, differences in swallow phase durations and amplitudes provide evidence that separate regulatory mechanisms exist which regulate spatial and temporal aspects of the behavior.

Indexed as

AnimalsCatsDeglutitionElectromyographyMuscle ContractionNeck MusclesPharynx

Identifiers

PMID25171095
PMCPMC4149527
OpenAlexW2013865657

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.