Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25170963›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Calprotectin and lactoferrin faecal levels in patients with Clostridium difficile infection (CDI): a prospective cohort study.

Andrew Swale, Fabio Miyajima, Paul Roberts, Amanda Hall, Margaret Little, Mike B J Beadsworth, Nick J Beeching, Ruwanthi Kolamunnage-Dona, Chris M Parry, Munir Pirmohamed

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04491799 (Fecal Calprotectin Level in Differentiating Between Inflammatory and Non-inflammatory Diarrhea in Patients With Nosocomial Diarrhea), which is not on this map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04491799 completednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Fecal Calprotectin Level in Differentiating Between Inflammatory and Non-inflammatory Diarrhea in Patients With Nosocomial Diarrhea

TypeobservationalSponsorMahidol UniversityRan2019 to 2020Enrolled135ConditionsDiarrhea, CalprotectinArmsFecal calprotectin
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The value of fecal calprotectin inFrontiers in physiology · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Biomarkers for Early Severity Prediction inMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026
    Review
  3. Observational
  4. Clostridioides difficile pathogenesis and control.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2026
    Review
  5. Diagnosis ofJournal of medical microbiology · 2024
    Review
  6. Clinical microbiology reviews · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Predictive value of fecal calprotectin and lactoferrin levels for negative outcomes in Clostridioides difficile infection.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2024
    Article
  9. Diagnostic Guidance for C. difficile Infections.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024
    Article
  10. Microbiome profile and calprotectin levels as markers of risk of recurrentFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Relationship between faecal metronidazole and lactoferrin concentrations to clinical response of patients with Clostridioides difficile.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Fecal calprotectin concentrations in cancer patients with Clostridium difficile infection.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2018
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Andrew SwaleThe Wolfson Centre for Personalised Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom; The Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospital Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Fabio MiyajimaThe Wolfson Centre for Personalised Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom; The Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospital Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Paul RobertsThe Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospital Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Amanda HallInstitute of Infection and Global Heath, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Margaret LittleThe Wolfson Centre for Personalised Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom; The Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospital Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Mike B J BeadsworthThe Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospital Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom; Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Nick J BeechingThe Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospital Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom; NIHR Health Protection Unit in Gastrointestinal Infections, Liverpool, United Kingdom; Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Ruwanthi Kolamunnage-DonaDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Chris M ParryInstitute of Infection and Global Heath, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom; Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Munir PirmohamedThe Wolfson Centre for Personalised Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom; The Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospital Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
University of Liverpool · GBRoyal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospital NHS Trust · GBLiverpool School of Tropical Medicine · GB

Funding

Department of Health BRF-2011-028Medical Research Council MR/K000551/1Medical Research Council MR/L006758/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Measurement of both calprotectin and lactoferrin in faeces has successfully been used to discriminate between functional and inflammatory bowel conditions, but evidence is limited for Clostridium difficile infection (CDI). We prospectively recruited a cohort of 164 CDI cases and 52 controls with antibiotic-associated diarrhoea (AAD). Information on disease severity, duration of symptoms, 30-day mortality and 90-day recurrence as markers of complicated CDI were recorded. Specimens were subject to microbiological culture and PCR-ribotyping. Levels of faecal calprotectin (FC) and lactoferrin (FL) were measured by ELISA. Statistical analysis was conducted using percentile categorisation. ROC curve analysis was employed to determine optimal cut-off values. Both markers were highly correlated with each other (r2 = 0.74) and elevated in cases compared to controls (p<0.0001; ROC>0.85), although we observed a large amount of variability across both groups. The optimal case-control cut-off point was 148 mg/kg for FC and 8.1 ng/µl for FL. Median values for FL in CDI cases were significantly greater in patients suffering from severe disease compared to non-severe disease (104.6 vs. 40.1 ng/µl, p = 0.02), but were not significant for FC (969.3 vs. 512.7 mg/kg, p = 0.09). Neither marker was associated with 90-day recurrence, prolonged CDI symptoms, positive culture results and colonisation by ribotype 027. Both FC and FL distinguished between CDI cases and AAD controls. Although FL was associated with disease severity in CDI patients, this showed high inter-individual variability and was an isolated finding. Thus, FC and FL are unlikely to be useful as biomarkers of complicated CDI disease.

Indexed as

AgedBiomarkersCase-Control StudiesClostridioides difficileClostridium InfectionsEnterocolitis, PseudomembranousFecesFemaleHumansLactoferrinLeukocyte L1 Antigen ComplexMaleProspective StudiesRibotypingBiomarkersLactoferrinLeukocyte L1 Antigen Complex

Identifiers

PMID25170963
PMCPMC4149523
OpenAlexW2026131141

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.