Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25170958›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Nanoparticle-encapsulated chlorhexidine against oral bacterial biofilms.

Chaminda Jayampath Seneviratne, Ken Cham-Fai Leung, Chi-Hin Wong, Siu-Fung Lee, Xuan Li, Ping Chung Leung, Clara Bik San Lau, Elaine Wat, Lijian Jin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 85 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Polymer vesicles for the delivery of inhibitors of cariogenic biofilm.Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Antibacterial effect of nano-chlorhexidine onDental research journal · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Chaminda Jayampath SeneviratneFaculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China; Faculty of Dentistry, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Ken Cham-Fai LeungDepartment of Chemistry, Institute of Creativity, and Partner State Key Laboratory of Environmental & Biological Analysis, The Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Chi-Hin WongDepartment of Chemistry, Institute of Creativity, and Partner State Key Laboratory of Environmental & Biological Analysis, The Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Siu-Fung LeeDepartment of Chemistry, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Xuan LiFaculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Ping Chung LeungInstitute of Chinese Medicine and Partner State Key Laboratory of Phytochemistry & Plant Resources in West China, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Clara Bik San LauInstitute of Chinese Medicine and Partner State Key Laboratory of Phytochemistry & Plant Resources in West China, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Elaine WatInstitute of Chinese Medicine and Partner State Key Laboratory of Phytochemistry & Plant Resources in West China, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Lijian JinFaculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Chinese University of Hong Kong · CNHong Kong Baptist University · HKUniversity of Hong Kong · HKNational University of Singapore · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChlorhexidine (CHX) is a widely used antimicrobial agent in dentistry. Herein, we report the synthesis of a novel mesoporous silica nanoparticle-encapsulated pure CHX (Nano-CHX), and its mechanical profile and antimicrobial properties against oral biofilms. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsThe release of CHX from the Nano-CHX was characterized by UV/visible absorption spectroscopy. The antimicrobial properties of Nano-CHX were evaluated in both planktonic and biofilm modes of representative oral pathogenic bacteria. The Nano-CHX demonstrated potent antibacterial effects on planktonic bacteria and mono-species biofilms at the concentrations of 50-200 µg/mL against Streptococcus mutans, Streptococcus sobrinus, Fusobacterium nucleatum, Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans and Enterococccus faecalis. Moreover, Nano-CHX effectively suppressed multi-species biofilms such as S. mutans, F. nucleatum, A. actinomycetemcomitans and Porphyromonas gingivalis up to 72 h. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: This pioneering study demonstrates the potent antibacterial effects of the Nano-CHX on oral biofilms, and it may be developed as a novel and promising anti-biofilm agent for clinical use.

Indexed as

Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitansAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Infective Agents, LocalBacteriaBacterial InfectionsBacterial Physiological PhenomenaBiofilmsChlorhexidineDental PlaqueDrug CarriersFusobacterium nucleatumHumansMouthNanoparticlesPorphyromonas gingivalisStreptococcus mutansAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Infective Agents, LocalChlorhexidineDrug Carriers

Identifiers

PMID25170958
PMCPMC4149348
OpenAlexW2017835083

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.