Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25170947›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Phage display and synthetic peptides as promising biotechnological tools for the serological diagnosis of leprosy.

Silvana Maria Alban, Juliana Ferreira de Moura, Vanete Thomaz-Soccol, Samira Bührer Sékula, Larissa Magalhães Alvarenga, Marcelo Távora Mira, Carlos Chávez Olortegui, João Carlos Minozzo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Insights intoProteomes · 2021
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Silvana Maria AlbanDepartment of Biotechnology and Bioprocess Engineering, Federal University of Parana, Curitiba, Parana, Brazil.
Juliana Ferreira de MouraBasic Pathology Department, Federal University of Parana, Curitiba, Parana, Brazil.
Vanete Thomaz-SoccolDepartment of Biotechnology and Bioprocess Engineering, Federal University of Parana, Curitiba, Parana, Brazil.
Samira Bührer SékulaImmunology Department, Tropical Pathology and Public Health Institute, Federal University of Goias, Goiania, Goias, Brazil.
Larissa Magalhães AlvarengaImmunology Department, Tropical Pathology and Public Health Institute, Federal University of Goias, Goiania, Goias, Brazil.
Marcelo Távora MiraHealth Sciences Postgraduate Program, School of Medicine, Pontifical Catholic University of Parana, Curitiba, Parana, Brazil.
Carlos Chávez OlorteguiDepartment of Biochemistry and Immunology, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
João Carlos MinozzoCenter for Production and Research of Immunobiological Products, Parana State Department of Health, Piraquara, Parana, Brazil.
Universidade Federal do Paraná · BRUniversidade Federal de Goiás · BRPontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná · BRUniversidade Estadual do Paraná · BRUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe diagnosis of leprosy is primarily based on clinical manifestations, and there is no widely available laboratory test for the early detection of this disease, which is caused by Mycobacterium leprae. In fact, early detection and treatment are the key elements to the successful control of leprosy. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsPeptide ligands for antibodies from leprosy patients were selected from phage-displayed peptide libraries. Three peptide sequences expressed by reactive phage clones were chemically synthesized. Serological assays that used synthetic peptides were evaluated using serum samples from leprosy patients, household contacts (HC) of leprosy patients, tuberculosis patients and endemic controls (EC). A pool of three peptides identified 73.9% (17/23) of multibacillary (MB) leprosy patients using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). These peptides also showed some seroreactivities to the HC and EC individuals. The peptides were not reactive to rabbit polyclonal antisera against the different environmental mycobacteria. The same peptides that were conjugated to the carrier protein bovine serum albumin (BSA) induced the production of antibodies in the mice. The anti-peptide antibodies that were used in the Western blotting analysis of M. leprae crude extracts revealed a single band of approximately 30 kDa in one-dimensional electrophoresis and four 30 kDa isoforms in the two-dimensional gel. The Western blotting data indicated that the three peptides are derived from the same bacterial protein. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: These new antigens may be useful in the diagnosis of MB leprosy patients. Their potentials as diagnostic reagents must be more extensively evaluated in future studies using a large panel of positive and negative sera. Furthermore, other test approaches using peptides should be assessed to increase their sensitivity and specificity in detecting leprosy patients. We have revealed evidence in support of phage-displayed peptides as promising biotechnological tools for the design of leprosy diagnostic serological assays.

Indexed as

Mycobacterium lepraePeptide LibraryAnimalsAntibodies, BacterialCattleEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayHumansLeprosyMiceRabbitsAntibodies, BacterialPeptide Library

Identifiers

PMID25170947
PMCPMC4149539
OpenAlexW2028341056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.