ArticlePloS one2014
Echoic memory: investigation of its temporal resolution by auditory offset cortical responses.
Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Visual change-related brain potentials elicited by changes in doll hair color in school-aged children.BMC neuroscience · 2025Article
- A new function of offset response in the primate auditory cortex: marker of temporal integration.Communications biology · 2024Article
- Omission responses in local field potentials in rat auditory cortex.BMC biology · 2023Article
- Mechanisms of Long-Latency Paired Pulse Suppression: MEG Study.Brain topography · 2022Article
- Auditory change-related cortical response is associated with hypervigilance to pain in healthy volunteers.European journal of pain (London, England) · 2022Article
- Relationship of loudness-dependent auditory evoked potentials with change-related cortical responses.PloS one · 2022Article
- Assessment of haptic memory using somatosensory change-related cortical responses.Human brain mapping · 2020Article
- A generic deviance detection principle for cortical On/Off responses, omission response, and mismatch negativity.Biological cybernetics · 2019Article
- Suppression of Somatosensory Evoked Cortical Responses by Noxious Stimuli.Brain topography · 2019Article
- Properties of echoic memory revealed by auditory-evoked magnetic fields.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Sound Change Integration Error: An Explanatory Model of Tinnitus.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2018Article
- Long-latency suppression of auditory and somatosensory change-related cortical responses.PloS one · 2018Article
- New paradigm for auditory paired pulse suppression.PloS one · 2017Article
- Inhibition in the Human Auditory Cortex.PloS one · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Previous studies showed that the amplitude and latency of the auditory offset cortical response depended on the history of the sound, which implicated the involvement of echoic memory in shaping a response. When a brief sound was repeated, the latency of the offset response depended precisely on the frequency of the repeat, indicating that the brain recognized the timing of the offset by using information on the repeat frequency stored in memory. In the present study, we investigated the temporal resolution of sensory storage by measuring auditory offset responses with magnetoencephalography (MEG). The offset of a train of clicks for 1 s elicited a clear magnetic response at approximately 60 ms (Off-P50m). The latency of Off-P50m depended on the inter-stimulus interval (ISI) of the click train, which was the longest at 40 ms (25 Hz) and became shorter with shorter ISIs (2.5∼20 ms). The correlation coefficient r2 for the peak latency and ISI was as high as 0.99, which suggested that sensory storage for the stimulation frequency accurately determined the Off-P50m latency. Statistical analysis revealed that the latency of all pairs, except for that between 200 and 400 Hz, was significantly different, indicating the very high temporal resolution of sensory storage at approximately 5 ms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.