Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25170558›Full record

ArticleBioconjugate chemistry2014

Rationally manipulating aptamer binding affinities in a stem-loop molecular beacon.

Rachel E Armstrong, Geoffrey F Strouse

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioconjugate chemistry, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Rachel E ArmstrongDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Florida State University , 95 Chieftan Way, Room 118 DLC, Tallahassee, Florida 32306, United States.
Geoffrey F Strouse

Funding

Nano-FRET: Analysis of Nucleoprotein ComplexesR01EB000832 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA · PI STROUSE, GEOFFREY F. · 2003 to 2006
$930k
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB000832NIBIB NIH HHS R01-EB00832
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Single-stranded DNA sequences that are highly specific for a target ligand are called aptamers. While the incorporation of aptamer sequences into stem-loop molecular beacons has become an essential tool in optical biosensors, the design principles that determine the magnitude of binding affinity and its relationship to placement of the aptamer sequence in the stem-loop architecture are not well defined. By controlled placement of the aptamer along the loop region of the molecular beacon, it is observed that the binding affinity can be tuned over 4 orders of magnitude (1.3 nM - 203 μM) for the Huizenga and Szostak ATP DNA aptamer sequence. It is observed that the Kd is enhanced for the fully exposed sequence, with reduced binding affinity when the aptamer is part of the stem region of the beacon. Analysis of the ΔG values indicate a clear correlation between the aptamer hybridized length in the stem and its observed Kd. The use of a nanometal surface energy transfer probe method for monitoring ATP binding to the aptamer sequence allows the observation of negative cooperativity between the two ATP binding events. Maintenance of the high binding affinity of this ATP aptamer and the observation of two separate Kd's for ATP binding indicate NSET as an effective, nonmanipulative, optical method for tracking biomolecular changes.

Indexed as

Adenosine TriphosphateAptamers, NucleotideBase SequenceBinding SitesBiosensing TechniquesThermodynamicsAdenosine TriphosphateAptamers, Nucleotide

Identifiers

PMID25170558
PMCPMC4198099

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.