Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25170549›Full record

ArticleEpidemiology and infection2015

Tuberculosis in Laos, who is at risk: the mahouts or their elephants?

J Lassausaie, A Bret, X Bouapao, V Chanthavong, J Castonguay-Vanier, F Quet, S K Mikota, C Théorêt, Y Buisson, B Bouchard

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epidemiology and infection, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Occupational exposure and challenges in tackling M. bovis at human-animal interface: a narrative review.International archives of occupational and environmental health · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Prevalence and Demographic Risk Factors ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

J LassausaieElefantAsia,Paris,France.
A BretElefantAsia,Paris,France.
X BouapaoInstitut de la Francophonie pour la Médecine Tropicale,Vientiane,Lao PDR.
V ChanthavongLao Elephant Care and Management Programme,Vientiane,Lao PDR.
J Castonguay-VanierElefantAsia,Paris,France.
F QuetInstitut de la Francophonie pour la Médecine Tropicale,Vientiane,Lao PDR.
S K MikotaElephant Care International,Hohenwald,USA.
C ThéorêtUniversité de Montréal,Faculté de médecine vétérinaire,Québec,Canada.
Y BuissonInstitut de la Francophonie pour la Médecine Tropicale,Vientiane,Lao PDR.
B BouchardElefantAsia,Paris,France.
Centre d’Infectiologie Christophe Mérieux of Laos · LARural Development Agency · LAMedical Care Development International · USUniversité de Montréal · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

SUMMARY Tuberculosis (TB) in elephants has the potential to infect humans and is an increasing public health concern. Lao PDR is one of the last countries where elephants are still used for timber extraction and where they live in close contact with their mahouts. There are 500 animals at work in the country, some interacting with wild herds. Although human TB prevalence is known to be high in Laos, studies on elephant TB had yet to be undertaken. From January to July 2012, screening was performed using the ElephantTB Stat-Pak assay on 80 elephants working around the Nam Pouy National Park in Sayaboury Province. This represents more than 18% of the total registered national working elephant population. Here we report that 36% of the elephants were seroreactive to the test. Of these, 31% had contacts with wild individuals, which suggests potential transmission of mycobacteria to the local wild herds. Clinical examination, chest X-rays, sputum microscopy and culture were performed on their 142 mahouts or owners. Despite high TB seroreactivity in elephants, no participant was smear- or culture-positive for Mycobacterium tuberculosis or M. bovis, although atypical mycobacteria were isolated from 4% of participants.

Indexed as

Disease VectorsAdolescentAdultAgedAnimalsCohort StudiesElephantsHumansLaosMaleMiddle AgedMycobacterium bovisMycobacterium tuberculosisNontuberculous MycobacteriaOccupational DiseasesOccupational Exposuretuberculosis (TB)

Identifiers

PMID25170549
PMCPMC9507153
OpenAlexW2086246825

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.