ReviewJournal of public health research2013
Disclosure of adverse events in the United States and Canada: an update, and a proposed framework for improvement.
Review in Journal of public health research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Patient Safety Culture in Latin American Hospitals: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Pooled it
- The views and experiences of patients and health-care professionals on the disclosure of adverse events: A systematic review and qualitative meta-ethnographic synthesis.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2020Pooled it
- Frequency, Expected Effects, Obstacles, and Facilitators of Disclosure of Patient Safety Incidents: A Systematic Review.Journal of preventive medicine and public health = Yebang Uihakhoe chi · 2017Pooled it
- What Can Apologies in the Electronic Health Record Tell Us About Health Care Quality, Processes, and Safety?Journal of patient safety · 2020Trial
- Patients Safety Events at Philippine General Hospital.Acta medica Philippina · 2025Article
- Final-year medical students' reflections on types of significant events in primary care.African journal of primary health care & family medicine · 2023Article
- Patient safety culture in South America: a cross-sectional study.BMJ open quality · 2023Article
- Strengthening open disclosure after incidents in maternity care: a realist synthesis of international research evidence.BMC health services research · 2023Article
- Providers' and Patients' Perspectives on Diagnostic Errors in the Acute Care Setting.Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety · 2023Article
- Prevalence, socio-demographics and service use determinants associated with disclosure of HIV/AIDS status to infected children: a systematic review and meta-analysis by 1985-2021.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2022Article
- Coping and Recovery in Surgical Residents after Adverse Events: The Second Victim Phenomenon.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2022Article
- What Factors Impact Implementation of Critical Incident Disclosure in Ontario Hospitals: A Multiple-Case Study.Healthcare policy = Politiques de sante · 2021Article
- The opioid-impaired provider: A call for national guidance to maximize rehabilitation while protecting patient safety.Health science reports · 2020Article
- Article
- Undergraduate medical students' attitudes towards medical errors and patient safety: a multi-center cross-sectional study in the Gaza Strip, Palestine.BMC medical education · 2020Article
- General Public's Attitudes Toward Disclosure of Patient Safety Incidents in Korea: Results of Disclosure of Patient Safety Incidents Survey I.Journal of patient safety · 2020Article
- Designing a Curriculum for the Disclosure of Medical Errors: A Requirement for a Positive Patient Safety Culture.Cureus · 2020Article
- Article
- American Pharmacists Attitudes and Behaviors Regarding Medication Error Disclosure.Innovations in pharmacy · 2020Article
- Attitudes of doctors and nurses to patient safety and errors in medical practice in the Gaza-Strip: a cross-sectional study.BMJ open · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There is consensus that physicians, health professionals and health care organizations should discuss harm that results from health care delivery (adverse events), including the reasons for harm, with patients and their families. Thought leaders and policy makers in the USA and Canada support this goal. However, there are gaps in both countries between patients and physicians in their attitudes about how errors should be handled, and between disclosure policies and their implementation in practice. This paper reviews the state of disclosure policy and practice in the two countries, and the barriers to full disclosure. Important barriers include fear of consequences, attitudes about disclosure, lack of skill and role models, and lack of peer and institutional support. The paper also describes the problem of the second victim, a corollary of disclosure whereby health care workers are also traumatized by the same events that harm patients. The presence of multiple practical and personal barriers to disclosure suggests the need for a comprehensive solution directed at multiple levels of the health care system, including health departments, institutions, local managers, professional staff, patients and families, and including legal, health system and local institutional support. At the local level, implementation could be based on a translating-evidence-into-practice framework. Applying this framework would involve the formation of teams, training, measurement and identification of local barriers to achieving universal disclosure of adverse events. Significance for public healthIt is inevitable that some patients will be harmed rather than helped by health care. There is consensus that patients and their families must be told about these harmful events. However, there are gaps between patient and physician attitudes about how errors should be handled, and between disclosure policies and their implementation. There are important barriers that impede disclosure, including fear of consequences, attitudes about disclosure, lack of skill, and lack of institutional support. A related problem is that of the second victim, whereby health care workers are traumatized by the same harmful events. This can impair their performance and further compromise safety. The problem is unlikely to be solved by focusing solely on increasing disclosure. A comprehensive solution is needed, directed at multiple levels of the health care system, including health departments, institutions, local managers, professional staff, patients and families, and including legal, health system and local institutional support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.