Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25170286›Full record

ReviewJournal of blood medicine2014

The diagnosis and treatment of dyskeratosis congenita: a review.

M Soledad Fernández García, Julie Teruya-Feldstein

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of blood medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 142 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Dyskeratosis congenita: a rare case report.Oxford medical case reports · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Inborn Errors of Immunity and Cytokine Storm Syndromes.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Overview of familial syndromes with increased skin malignancies.Archives of dermatological research · 2023
    Review
  14. Dyskeratosis congenita with heterozygousRespiratory medicine case reports · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

M Soledad Fernández GarcíaDepartment of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA ; Department of Pathology, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Oviedo, Spain.
Julie Teruya-FeldsteinDepartment of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dyskeratosis congenita (DC) is an inherited bone marrow failure (BMF) syndrome characterized by the classic triad of abnormal skin pigmentation, nail dystrophy, and oral leukoplakia. However, patients usually develop BMF and are predisposed to cancer, with increased risk for squamous cell carcinoma and hematolymphoid neoplasms. DC is a disease of defective telomere maintenance and is heterogeneous at the genetic level. It can be inherited in X-linked, autosomal dominant, or autosomal recessive patterns. Mutations in at least ten telomere- and telomerase-associated genes have been described in DC. There are no targeted therapies for DC and patients usually die of BMF due to a deficient renewing capability of hematopoietic stem cells. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is the only curative treatment for BMF.

Indexed as

clinicaldiagnosisdyskeratosis congenitageneticstreatment

Identifiers

PMID25170286
PMCPMC4145822
OpenAlexW2070795324

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.