Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25169924›Full record

ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2015

Double inversion recovery sequence of the cervical spinal cord in multiple sclerosis and related inflammatory diseases.

I Riederer, D C Karampinos, M Settles, C Preibisch, J S Bauer, J F Kleine, M Mühlau, C Zimmer

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Improved detection of multiple sclerosis lesions with T2-prepared double inversion recovery at 3T.Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Does T2 inversion aid in identifying disc pathologies?Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Advances in spinal cord imaging in multiple sclerosis.Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2019
    Review
  18. Review
  19. The Role of Advanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging Techniques in Multiple Sclerosis Clinical Trials.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2017
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

I RiedererFrom the Departments of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology (I.R., C.P., J.S.B., J.F.K., C.Z.) Isabelle.riederer@tum.de.
D C KarampinosDiagnostic and Interventional Radiology (D.C.K., M.S.).
M SettlesDiagnostic and Interventional Radiology (D.C.K., M.S.).
C PreibischFrom the Departments of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology (I.R., C.P., J.S.B., J.F.K., C.Z.) Neuroimaging Center at the Technische Universität München (C.P., M.M.).
J S BauerFrom the Departments of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology (I.R., C.P., J.S.B., J.F.K., C.Z.).
J F KleineFrom the Departments of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology (I.R., C.P., J.S.B., J.F.K., C.Z.).
M MühlauNeuroimaging Center at the Technische Universität München (C.P., M.M.) Department of Neurology (M.M.), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.
C ZimmerFrom the Departments of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology (I.R., C.P., J.S.B., J.F.K., C.Z.).
Society of Interventional Radiology · USCognitive Neuroimaging Lab · FRKlinikum rechts der Isar · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeMR imaging plays an important role in diagnosing MS and other related inflammatory diseases; however, imaging of the spinal cord is still challenging. We hypothesized that a 3D double inversion recovery sequence for cervical spinal cord imaging would be more sensitive in detecting inflammatory lesions than a conventional 2D T2-weighted TSE sequence at 3T. MATERIALS AND

methodsOn a 3T MR imaging scanner, we examined 30 patients with suspected or established MS (MS, n = 16; clinically isolated syndrome, n = 12; isolated myelitis, n = 2) and 10 healthy controls. Newly developed 3D double inversion recovery and conventional 2D axial and sagittal T2-weighted TSE images of the cervical spinal cord were acquired. Two blinded neuroradiologists independently assessed the scans in pseudorandomized order for lesion numbers and rated lesion visibility and overall image quality on 5-point scales. A subsequent consensus reading delivered definite lesion counts. Standardized contrast-to-noise ratios were calculated in representative lesions of each patient.

resultsOverall, 28% more lesions could be detected with 3D double inversion recovery than with conventional T2WI (119 versus 93, P < .002). On average, the standardized contrast-to-noise ratio was significantly higher (P < .001) in double inversion recovery than in T2WI. Lesion visibility was rated significantly higher (P < .001) in double inversion recovery compared with T2WI despite lower image quality.

conclusionsThe novel 3D double inversion recovery sequence allowed better detection of lesions in MS and related inflammatory diseases of the cervical spinal cord, compared with conventional 2D T2WI.

Indexed as

AdultCervical VertebraeDemyelinating DiseasesFemaleHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedImaging, Three-DimensionalMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedMultiple SclerosisMyelitisNeuroimaging

Identifiers

PMID25169924
PMCPMC7965908
OpenAlexW2038869501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.