Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25169880›Full record

ArticleAppetite2014

Motives for eating tasty foods associated with binge-eating. Results from a student and a weight-loss seeking population.

M M Boggiano, E E Burgess, B Turan, T Soleymani, S Daniel, L D Vinson, K L Lokken, B C Wingo, A Morse

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Appetite, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M M BoggianoDepartment of Psychology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, USA. Electronic address: boggiano@uab.edu.
E E BurgessDepartment of Psychology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, USA.
B TuranDepartment of Psychology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, USA.
T SoleymaniDepartment of Nutrition Sciences, University of Alabama at Birmingham, USA.
S DanielDepartment of Nutrition Sciences, University of Alabama at Birmingham, USA.
L D VinsonDepartment of Nutrition Sciences, University of Alabama at Birmingham, USA.
K L LokkenDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurobiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, USA.
B C WingoDepartment of Nutrition Sciences, University of Alabama at Birmingham, USA.
A MorseDepartment of Psychology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, USA.
University of Alabama at Birmingham · US

Funding

UAB Diabetes Research and Training CenterP60DK079626 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI GARVEY, W TIMOTHY · 2008 to 2012
$8.4M
NIDDK NIH HHS P60 DK079626
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to use the Palatable Eating Motives Scale (PEMS) to determine if and what motives for eating tasty foods (e.g., junk food, fast food, and desserts) are associated with binge-eating in two diverse populations. BMI and scores on the PEMS, Yale Food Addiction Scale (YFAS), and Binge-eating Scale (BES) were obtained from 247 undergraduates at the University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB) and 249 weight-loss seeking patients at the UAB EatRight program. Regression analyses revealed that eating tasty foods to forget worries and problems and help alleviate negative feelings (i.e., the 4-item Coping motive) was associated with binge-eating independently of any variance in BES scores due to sex, age, ethnicity, BMI, other PEMS motives, and YFAS scores in both students (R² = .57) and patients (R² = .55). Coping also was associated with higher BMI in students (p < 0.01), and in patients despite their truncated BMI range (p < 0.05). Among students, the motives Conformity and Reward Enhancement were also independently associated with binge-eating. For this younger sample with a greater range of BES scores, eating for these motives, but not for Social ones, may indicate early maladaptive eating habits that could later develop into disorders characterized by binge-eating if predisposing factors are present. Thus, identifying one's tasty food motive or motives can potentially be used to thwart the development of BED and obesity, especially if the motive is Coping. Identifying one's PEMS motives should also help personalize conventional treatments for binge-eating and obesity toward improved outcomes.

Indexed as

Diet, ReducingFood PreferencesMotivationPatient ComplianceAdaptation, PsychologicalAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAlabamaBody Mass IndexBulimiaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedBEDEmotionsMotivationObesityPalatable foodStress

Identifiers

PMID25169880
PMCPMC4962333
OpenAlexW2024259078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.