Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25169255›Full record

ReviewBehavioural brain research2015

Assessing rodent hippocampal involvement in the novel object recognition task. A review.

Sarah J Cohen, Robert W Stackman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Behavioural brain research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 295 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
295citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

295 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

235 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sarah J CohenCenter for Complex Systems & Brain Sciences, Florida Atlantic University, 777 Glades Road, Boca Raton, FL 33431, USA. Electronic address: scohen39@fau.edu.
Robert W StackmanCenter for Complex Systems & Brain Sciences, Florida Atlantic University, 777 Glades Road, Boca Raton, FL 33431, USA; Department of Psychology, Charles E. Schmidt College of Science, Florida Atlantic University, John D. MacArthur Campus, 5353 Parkside Drive, Jupiter, FL 33458, USA. Electronic address: rstackma@fau.edu.

Funding

Memory modulation by SK channelsR01MH086591 · NIMH · FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY · PI STACKMAN, ROBERT WILLIAM · 2009 to 2013
$1.5M
NIMH NIH HHS MH086591NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH086591
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The novel object recognition (NOR) task has emerged as a popular method for testing the neurobiology of nonspatial memory in rodents. This task exploits the natural tendency of rodents to explore novel items and depending on the amount of time that rodents spend exploring the presented objects, inferences about memory can be established. Despite its wide use, the underlying neural circuitry and mechanisms supporting NOR have not been clearly defined. In particular, considerable debate has focused on whether the hippocampus plays a significant role in the object memory that is encoded, consolidated and then retrieved during discrete stages of the NOR task. Here we analyzed the results of all published reports in which the role of the rodent hippocampus in object memory was inferred from performance in the task with restricted parameters. We note that the remarkable variability in NOR methods across studies complicates the ability to draw meaningful conclusions from the work. Focusing on 12 reports in which a minimum criterion of sample session object exploration was imposed, we find that temporary or permanent lesion of the hippocampus consistently disrupts object memory when a delay of 10 min or greater is imposed between the sample and test sessions. We discuss the significance of a delay-dependent role of the hippocampus in NOR within the framework of the medial temporal lobe. We assert that standardization of the NOR protocol is essential for obtaining reliable data that can then be compared across studies to build consensus as to the specific contribution of the rodent hippocampus to object memory.

Indexed as

AnimalsHippocampusMiceNeuropsychological TestsRatsRecognition, PsychologyHippocampusInactivationLesionMemoryObject recognitionRodents

Identifiers

PMID25169255
PMCPMC7008635

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.