Trial reportJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2015
Prognostic influences of lymph node ratio in major cancers of Taiwan: a longitudinal study from a single cancer center.
Trial report in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Breast Cancer Patients With Positive Apical or Infraclavicular/Ipsilateral Supraclavicular Lymph Nodes Should Be Excluded in the Application of the Lymph Node Ratio System.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022Article
- Lymph Node Ratio Is an Independent Prognostic Factor for Patients with Siewert Type II Adenocarcinoma of Esophagogastric Junction: Results from a 10-Year Follow-up Study.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2021Article
- Prognostic Significance of Metastatic Lymph Nodes Ratio (MLNR) Combined with Protein-Tyrosine Phosphatase H1 (PTPH1) Expression in Operable Breast Invasive Ductal Carcinoma.Cancer management and research · 2020Article
- Recommendation for incorporation of a different lymph node scoring system in future AJCC N category for oral cancer.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Which is the most suitable lymph node predictor for overall survival after primary surgery of head and neck cancer: pN, the number or the ratio of positive lymph nodes, or log odds?Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2016Article
- Prognostic significance of metastatic lymph node ratio in squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix.OncoTargets and therapy · 2016Article
- The Prognostic Ability of Log Odds of Positive Lymph Nodes in Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma.Medicine · 2015Article
- Prognostic significance of lymph node ratio in esophageal cancer.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe utility of lymph node ratio (LNR) in predicting outcomes has been reported previously. In current study, we further subgroup by LNR in subjects with lymph nodes metastasis of colorectal cancer, breast cancer, and head and neck cancer.
methodsCancers with pathological lymph node metastasis (pN+) at time of diagnosis between 2004 and 2012 were identified from the cancer registry database of the Dalin Tzu Chi General Hospital. The Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank test and the Cox proportional hazards model were used to compare the disease-specific survival (DSS) rates for different LNR after adjusting for possible confounding risk factors.
resultsA total of 431 cancer patients with pN+ were eligible in the current study: 149 patients with colorectal cancer; 141 patients with breast cancer; and 141 patients with head and neck cancer. High LNR was associated with poor DSS rates with the mean 24-45 months of follow-up period. In the multivariate analysis, high LNR was an independent poor prognostic factor in colorectal cancer (LNR ≥ 0.5; HR 4.10; p < 0.001), breast cancer (LNR ≥ 0.8; HR 5.75; p = 0.002), and head and neck cancer (LNR ≥ 0.4; HR 2.56; p = 0.005).
conclusionHigh LNR exerts a significant role as a negative prognostic factor when comparing the traditional American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) lymph nodes classification for major cancers. Therefore, LNR could be considered as an alternative and superior to, at least partially, traditional AJCC lymph nodes classification for cancer patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.