Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25169194›Full record

Trial reportJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2015

Prognostic influences of lymph node ratio in major cancers of Taiwan: a longitudinal study from a single cancer center.

Yen-Lin Chen, Cheng-Yi Wang, Chin-Chia Wu, Moon-Sing Lee, Shih-Kai Hung, Wei-Chou Chen, Chih-Yao Hsu, Chia-Wen Hsu, Chih-Yuan Huang, Yu-Chieh Su and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Prognostic significance of lymph node ratio in esophageal cancer.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Yen-Lin ChenDepartment of Pathology, School of Medicine, Cardinal Tien Hospital, Fu-Jen Catholic University, New Taipei City, Taiwan.
Cheng-Yi Wang
Chin-Chia Wu
Moon-Sing Lee
Shih-Kai Hung
Wei-Chou Chen
Chih-Yao Hsu
Chia-Wen Hsu
Chih-Yuan Huang
Yu-Chieh Su
Ching-Chih Lee
Tzu Chi University · TWCardinal Tien Hospital · TWTzu Chi Foundation · TWKaohsiung Municipal Kai-Syuan Psychiatric Hospital · TWTaipei Tzu Chi Hospital · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe utility of lymph node ratio (LNR) in predicting outcomes has been reported previously. In current study, we further subgroup by LNR in subjects with lymph nodes metastasis of colorectal cancer, breast cancer, and head and neck cancer.

methodsCancers with pathological lymph node metastasis (pN+) at time of diagnosis between 2004 and 2012 were identified from the cancer registry database of the Dalin Tzu Chi General Hospital. The Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank test and the Cox proportional hazards model were used to compare the disease-specific survival (DSS) rates for different LNR after adjusting for possible confounding risk factors.

resultsA total of 431 cancer patients with pN+ were eligible in the current study: 149 patients with colorectal cancer; 141 patients with breast cancer; and 141 patients with head and neck cancer. High LNR was associated with poor DSS rates with the mean 24-45 months of follow-up period. In the multivariate analysis, high LNR was an independent poor prognostic factor in colorectal cancer (LNR ≥ 0.5; HR 4.10; p < 0.001), breast cancer (LNR ≥ 0.8; HR 5.75; p = 0.002), and head and neck cancer (LNR ≥ 0.4; HR 2.56; p = 0.005).

conclusionHigh LNR exerts a significant role as a negative prognostic factor when comparing the traditional American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) lymph nodes classification for major cancers. Therefore, LNR could be considered as an alternative and superior to, at least partially, traditional AJCC lymph nodes classification for cancer patients.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBreast NeoplasmsColorectal NeoplasmsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansLongitudinal StudiesLymph NodesMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPrognosisSurvival RateTaiwan

Identifiers

PMID25169194
PMCPMC11823509
OpenAlexW2045735697

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.