Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25168900›Full record

ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2014

Dark-adaptation functions in molecularly confirmed achromatopsia and the implications for assessment in retinal therapy trials.

Jonathan Aboshiha, Vy Luong, Jill Cowing, Adam M Dubis, James W Bainbridge, Robin R Ali, Andrew R Webster, Anthony T Moore, Frederick W Fitzke, Michel Michaelides

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A nonhuman primate model of inherited retinal disease.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2019
    Article
  6. Observational
  7. Gene Therapy for Color Blindness.The Yale journal of biology and medicine · 2017
    Review
  8. The cone dysfunction syndromes.The British journal of ophthalmology · 2016
    Review
  9. Phenotype and genotype of 15 Saudi patients with achromatopsia: A case series.Saudi journal of ophthalmology : official journal of the Saudi Ophthalmological Society
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jonathan AboshihaUCL Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, London, United Kingdom Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Vy LuongUCL Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Jill CowingUCL Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Adam M DubisUCL Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, London, United Kingdom Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
James W BainbridgeUCL Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, London, United Kingdom Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Robin R AliUCL Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Andrew R WebsterUCL Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, London, United Kingdom Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Anthony T MooreUCL Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, London, United Kingdom Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Frederick W FitzkeUCL Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Michel MichaelidesUCL Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, London, United Kingdom Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
University College London · GBMoorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust · GBMoorfields Eye Hospital · GB

Funding

Department of Health NIHR-RP-011-003Medical Research Council MR/K025589/1Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 099173/Z/12/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo describe the dark-adaptation (DA) functions in subjects with molecularly proven achromatopsia (ACHM) using refined testing conditions with a view to guiding assessment in forthcoming gene therapy trials.

methodsThe DA functions of nine subjects with ACHM were measured and compared with those of normal observers. The size and retinal location of the stimuli used to measure DA sensitivities were varied in four distinct testing condition sets, and the effect of altering these parameters assessed.

resultsIn three of the four testing condition sets, achromats had significantly higher mean final thresholds than normal observers, whereas in the fourth condition set they did not. A larger, more central stimulus revealed the greatest difference between the final DA thresholds of achromat and normal subjects, and also demonstrated the slowest rate of recovery among the achromat group.

conclusionsIn this, the largest study of DA functions in molecularly proven ACHM to date, we have identified optimal testing conditions that accentuate the relative difference between achromats and normal observers. These findings can help optimize DA testing in future trials, as well as help resolve the dichotomy in the literature regarding the normality or otherwise of DA functions in ACHM. Furthermore, the shorter testing time and less intense adaptation light used in these experiments may prove advantageous for more readily and reliably probing scotopic function in retinal disease, and be particularly valuable in the frequent post therapeutic assessments required in the context of the marked photophobia in ACHM.

Indexed as

Dark AdaptationGenetic MarkersAdolescentAdultBiomarkersColor Vision DefectsElectroretinographyFemaleGenetic TherapyHumansMaleMiddle AgedMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesPrognosisRetinaYoung AdultBiomarkersGenetic Markersachromatopsiadark adaptationgene therapyrod monochromatismrod vision

Identifiers

PMID25168900
PMCPMC4193759
OpenAlexW2017844650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.