Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25168780›Full record

Observational studySupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2015

Use of non-opioid analgesics as adjuvants to opioid analgesia for cancer pain management in an inpatient palliative unit: does this improve pain control and reduce opioid requirements?

Shivani Shinde, Pamela Gordon, Prashant Sharma, James Gross, Mellar P Davis

Open access · bronzeAbstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Opioid Analgesia and Opioid-Induced Adverse Effects: A Review.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Association Between Dual Trajectories of Opioid and Gabapentinoid Use and Healthcare Expenditures Among US Medicare Beneficiaries.Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Use of gabapentinoid medications among US adults with cancer, 2005-2015.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shivani ShindeThe Harry R Horvitz Center for Palliative Medicine, Division of Solid Tumor, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, 9500 Euclid Avenue, R35, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.
Pamela Gordon
Prashant Sharma
James Gross
Mellar P Davis
Cleveland Clinic · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCancer pain is complex, and despite the introduction of the WHO cancer pain ladder, few studies have looked at the prevalence of adjuvant medication use in an inpatient palliative medicine unit. In this study, we evaluate the use of adjuvant pain medications in patients admitted to an inpatient palliative care unit and whether their use affects pain scores or opiate dosing.

methodsIn this retrospective observational study, patients admitted to the inpatient palliative care unit over a 3-month period with a diagnosis of cancer on opioid therapy were selected. Data pertaining to demographics, diagnosis, oral morphine dose equivalent of the opioid at the time of discharge, adjuvant analgesics, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and pain scores as reported by nurses and physicians were collected.

resultsSeventy-seven patients were eligible over a 3-month period, out of which 65 (84 %) were taking an adjuvant medication. The most commonly prescribed adjuvant was gabapentin (70 %). Fifty-seven percent were taking more than one adjuvant. There were more women in the group receiving adjuvants (57 vs. 17%, p = 0.010). Those without adjuvants compared with those on adjuvants did not have worse pain scores on discharge as reported by physicians (0.8 ± 0.8 vs. 1.0 ± 0.7, p = 0.58) or nurses (2.0 ± 2.7 vs. 2.1 ± 2.6, p = 0.86). There was no difference in morphine equivalent doses of the opioid in both groups (median (min, max); 112 (58, 504) vs. 200 (30, 5,040)) at the time of discharge; 75-80 % of patients had improvement in pain scores as measured by a two-point reduction in numerical rating scale (NRS). DISCUSSION: This study shows that adjuvant medications are commonly used for treating pain in patients with cancer. More than half of study population were on two adjuvants or an adjuvant plus NSAID along with an opioid. We did not demonstrate any benefit in terms of improved pain scores or opioid doses with adjuvants, but this could reflect confounding variables and physician choice. Larger prospective studies are needed to define the opioid-sparing effects of adjuvants.

conclusionAdjuvant agents are used in over 80 % of those treated for cancer pain.

Indexed as

AgedAminesAnalgesics, OpioidAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalChemotherapy, AdjuvantCyclohexanecarboxylic AcidsDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleGabapentingamma-Aminobutyric AcidHumansMaleMiddle AgedMorphineNeoplasmsPainAminesAnalgesics, OpioidAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalCyclohexanecarboxylic AcidsGabapentingamma-Aminobutyric AcidMorphine

Identifiers

PMID25168780
OpenAlexW2030944974

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.