Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25168033›Full record

ArticleNicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco2015

Smoking behavior: a cross-sectional study to assess the dimensionality of the brief Wisconsin inventory of smoking dependence motives and identify different typologies among young daily smokers.

Luca Pancani, Marco D'Addario, Erika Rosa Cappelletti, Andrea Greco, Dario Monzani, Patrizia Steca

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Psychometric Properties of the FTCD and Brief WISDM: Support for Validity in a Legal-System-Involved Sample.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Psychometric Characteristics of the Brief Wisconsin Inventory of Smoking Dependence Motives Among a Nonclinical Sample of Smokers.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2016
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Luca PancaniDepartment of Psychology, Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy l.pancani@campus.unimib.it.
Marco D'AddarioDepartment of Psychology, Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
Erika Rosa CappellettiDepartment of Psychology, Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
Andrea GrecoDepartment of Psychology, Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
Dario MonzaniDepartment of Psychology, Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
Patrizia StecaDepartment of Psychology, Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe present study aims to investigate the dimensionality of the brief version of the Wisconsin Inventory of Smoking Dependence Motives (B-WISDM) and identify different smoking motivational profiles among young daily smokers (N = 375).

methodsWe tested 3 measurement models of the B-WISDM using confirmatory factor analysis, whereas cluster analysis was used to identify the smokers' motivational profiles. Furthermore, we compared clusters toward dependence level and the number of cigarettes smoked per day using analysis of variance tests.

resultsThe results confirmed that the B-WISDM measures 11 first-order intercorrelated factors. The second-order model, originally proposed for the longer version of the questionnaire, showed adequate fit indices but fitted the data significantly worse than the first-order model. Five motivational clusters were identified and differed in terms of tobacco addiction and the number of cigarettes smoked per day. Although each cluster had specific features, 2 main smoker groups were distinguished: Group A (composed of 3 clusters), which was mainly characterized by high levels of secondary dependence motives, and Group B (composed of 2 clusters), in which the primary and secondary dependence motives reached similar levels. In general, the clusters of Group B were more addicted to cigarettes than Group A clusters.

conclusionsUsing the B-WISDM to identify different smoking motivational profiles has important practical implications because they might help characterize addiction, which represents the first step to help an individual quit smoking.

Indexed as

Behavior, AddictiveMotivationAdolescentAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHumansMalePsychiatric Status Rating ScalesReproducibility of ResultsSmokingSmoking CessationSmoking PreventionSurveys and QuestionnairesWisconsin

Identifiers

PMID25168033
PMCPMC4832969

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.