Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25167362›Full record

ArticlePublic health nutrition2015

Sodium content and labelling of processed and ultra-processed food products marketed in Brazil.

Carla Adriano Martins, Anete Araújo de Sousa, Marcela Boro Veiros, David Alejandro González-Chica, Rossana Pacheco da Costa Proença

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Public health nutrition, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Carla Adriano Martins1Nutrition Post-Graduate Program,Federal University of Santa Catarina,Campus Universitário,Trindade,88040-900 Florianópolis, SC,Brazil.
Anete Araújo de Sousa1Nutrition Post-Graduate Program,Federal University of Santa Catarina,Campus Universitário,Trindade,88040-900 Florianópolis, SC,Brazil.
Marcela Boro Veiros1Nutrition Post-Graduate Program,Federal University of Santa Catarina,Campus Universitário,Trindade,88040-900 Florianópolis, SC,Brazil.
David Alejandro González-Chica1Nutrition Post-Graduate Program,Federal University of Santa Catarina,Campus Universitário,Trindade,88040-900 Florianópolis, SC,Brazil.
Rossana Pacheco da Costa Proença1Nutrition Post-Graduate Program,Federal University of Santa Catarina,Campus Universitário,Trindade,88040-900 Florianópolis, SC,Brazil.
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo analyse the Na content and labelling of processed and ultra-processed food products marketed in Brazil.

designCross-sectional study.

settingA large supermarket in Florianopolis, southern Brazil. SUBJECTS: Ingredient lists and Na information on nutrition labels of all processed and ultra-processed pre-prepared meals and prepared ingredients, used in lunch or dinner, available for sale in the supermarket.

resultsThe study analysed 1416 products, distributed into seven groups and forty-one subgroups. Five products did not have Na information. Most products (58.8 %; 95 % CI 55.4, 62.2 %) had high Na content (>600 mg/100 g). In 78.0 % of the subgroups, variation in Na content was at least twofold between similar products with high and low Na levels, reaching 634-fold difference in the 'garnishes and others' subgroup. More than half of the products (52.0 %; 95 % CI 48.2, 55.6 %) had at least one Na-containing food additive. There was no relationship between the appearance of salt on the ingredients list (first to third position on the list) and a product's Na content (high, medium or low; P=0.08).

conclusionsMost food products had high Na content, with great variation between similar products, which presents new evidence for reformulation opportunities. There were inconsistencies in Na labelling, such as lack of nutritional information and incomplete ingredient descriptions. The position of salt on the ingredients list did not facilitate the identification of high-Na foods. We therefore recommend a reduction in Na in these products and a review of Brazilian legislation.

Indexed as

Food LabelingMealsBrazilCross-Sectional StudiesDiet, Sodium-RestrictedFast FoodsFood AdditivesFood, PreservedHumansLunchNeeds AssessmentNutrition PolicyPatient ComplianceSodium Chloride, DietarySodium, DietaryFood AdditivesSodium Chloride, DietarySodium, DietaryConsumer

Identifiers

PMID25167362
PMCPMC10271378
OpenAlexW2161408490

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.