Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25167320›Full record

ArticlePhysical review letters2013

Coordinated switching of bacterial flagellar motors: evidence for direct motor-motor coupling?

Bo Hu, Yuhai Tu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physical review letters, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Bacteria push the limits of chemotactic precision to navigate dynamic chemical gradients.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. How input noise limits biochemical sensing in ultrasensitive systems.Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics · 2014
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Bo HuIBM T.J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, New York 10598, USA.
Yuhai TuIBM T.J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, New York 10598, USA.

Funding

Quantitative Modeling of Signal Transduction in Bacterial ChemotaxisR01GM081747 · NIGMS · IBM THOMAS J. WATSON RESEARCH CENTER · PI TU, YUHAI · 2007 to 2018
$2.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM081747NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM081747
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The swimming of Escherichia coli is powered by its multiple flagellar motors. Each motor spins either clockwise or counterclockwise, under the control of an intracellular regulator, CheY-P. There can be two mechanisms (extrinsic and intrinsic) to coordinate the switching of bacterial motors. The extrinsic one arises from the fact that different motors in the same cell sense a common input (CheY-P) which fluctuates near the motors' response threshold. An alternative, intrinsic mechanism is direct motor-motor coupling which makes synchronized switching energetically favorable. Here, we develop simple models for both mechanisms and uncover their different hallmarks. A quantitative comparison to the recent experiments suggests that the direct coupling mechanism may be accountable for the observed sharp correlation between motors in a single Escherichia coli. Possible origins of this coupling (e.g., hydrodynamic interaction) are discussed.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalBacterial ProteinsChemotaxisEscherichia coliEscherichia coli ProteinsFlagellaHydrodynamicsMembrane ProteinsMethyl-Accepting Chemotaxis ProteinsSwimmingBacterial ProteinscheY protein, E coliEscherichia coli ProteinsMembrane ProteinsMethyl-Accepting Chemotaxis Proteins

Identifiers

PMID25167320
PMCPMC4151272

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.