ReviewAnnals of the American Thoracic Society2014
Open-access biorepository for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. The way forward.
Review in Annals of the American Thoracic Society, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Registries for Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: When Is It Time to Go Global?Annals of the American Thoracic Society · 2020Article
- Patient Registries in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2019Review
- Fibrosis: Lessons from OMICS analyses of the human lung.Matrix biology : journal of the International Society for Matrix Biology · 2018Review
- Impact of Transcriptomics on Our Understanding of Pulmonary Fibrosis.Frontiers in medicine · 2018Review
- An American Thoracic Society Official Research Statement: Future Directions in Lung Fibrosis Research.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2016Article
- Rationale for and design of the Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis-PRospective Outcomes (IPF-PRO) registry.BMJ open respiratory research · 2016Article
- Models of disease behavior in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.BMC medicine · 2015Article
- Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: Diagnosis and Clinical Manifestations.Clinical medicine insights. Circulatory, respiratory and pulmonary medicine · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Although widespread use of animal modeling has transformed pulmonary research, the overarching goal of biomedical research is to enhance our understanding of human physiology and pathology. Thus, we believe that future gains in understanding human lung disease will be enhanced when studying patient-derived samples becomes an integral part of the investigational process. For idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), investigators need quality human specimens, collected in a standardized fashion, along with carefully annotated, long-term clinical and outcomes data to address current knowledge gaps. Access to human lung tissues through commercial entities or the Lung Tissue Resource Consortium, an NHLBI-funded consortium, has demonstrated the feasibility of this approach. However, these samples are not always well annotated or collected uniformly and are limited in their breadth to address future IPF research needs. Therefore, we propose leveraging ongoing and future studies in IPF to establish a biorepository that will meet current and future needs of IPF investigations. Specifically, we propose that blood, cell, and lung samples, linked to robust longitudinal clinical phenotyping generated from future industry, federally sponsored, and investigator-initiated clinical studies be prospectively and uniformly collected and stored in a biorepository and linked registry. Here we outline standardized methodologies that would allow specimens and clinical data collected from different studies to be integrated and accessible to the IPF research community for investigations that will inform future basic and translational research in IPF. Such a biorepository needs the combined efforts of all stakeholders, to be driven by projected future scientific needs and to be available to all qualified researchers. We believe this infrastructure is crucial, is feasible, and would accelerate research in IPF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.