Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25167209›Full record

ReviewAnnals of the American Thoracic Society2014

Open-access biorepository for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. The way forward.

Eric S White, Kevin K Brown, Harold R Collard, Craig S Conoscenti, Gregory P Cosgrove, Kevin R Flaherty, Jonathan A Leff, Fernando J Martinez, Jesse Roman, Dan Rose and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of the American Thoracic Society, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Patient Registries in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2019
    Review
  3. Fibrosis: Lessons from OMICS analyses of the human lung.Matrix biology : journal of the International Society for Matrix Biology · 2018
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: Diagnosis and Clinical Manifestations.Clinical medicine insights. Circulatory, respiratory and pulmonary medicine · 2015
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Eric S White1 Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Kevin K Brown
Harold R Collard
Craig S Conoscenti
Gregory P Cosgrove
Kevin R Flaherty
Jonathan A Leff
Fernando J Martinez
Jesse Roman
Dan Rose
Shelia Violette
Naftali Kaminski

Funding

PULMONARY CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY TRAININGT32HL007749 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Robert Pickett Dickson · 1993 to 2026
$19.9M
NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007749
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although widespread use of animal modeling has transformed pulmonary research, the overarching goal of biomedical research is to enhance our understanding of human physiology and pathology. Thus, we believe that future gains in understanding human lung disease will be enhanced when studying patient-derived samples becomes an integral part of the investigational process. For idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), investigators need quality human specimens, collected in a standardized fashion, along with carefully annotated, long-term clinical and outcomes data to address current knowledge gaps. Access to human lung tissues through commercial entities or the Lung Tissue Resource Consortium, an NHLBI-funded consortium, has demonstrated the feasibility of this approach. However, these samples are not always well annotated or collected uniformly and are limited in their breadth to address future IPF research needs. Therefore, we propose leveraging ongoing and future studies in IPF to establish a biorepository that will meet current and future needs of IPF investigations. Specifically, we propose that blood, cell, and lung samples, linked to robust longitudinal clinical phenotyping generated from future industry, federally sponsored, and investigator-initiated clinical studies be prospectively and uniformly collected and stored in a biorepository and linked registry. Here we outline standardized methodologies that would allow specimens and clinical data collected from different studies to be integrated and accessible to the IPF research community for investigations that will inform future basic and translational research in IPF. Such a biorepository needs the combined efforts of all stakeholders, to be driven by projected future scientific needs and to be available to all qualified researchers. We believe this infrastructure is crucial, is feasible, and would accelerate research in IPF.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchHumansIdiopathic Pulmonary FibrosisInformaticsSpecimen HandlingTissue Banksbiological specimen bankshumanslungresearch prioritiesrespiratory tract diseases

Identifiers

PMID25167209
PMCPMC4299004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.