Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25167135›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2014

What controls DNA looping?

Pamela J Perez, Nicolas Clauvelin, Michael A Grosner, Andrew V Colasanti, Wilma K Olson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Nanoscale Interaction of Endonuclease APE1 with DNA.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Pamela J PerezBioMaPS Institute for Quantitative Biology, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA. pperez@scarletmail.rutgers.edu.
Nicolas ClauvelinBioMaPS Institute for Quantitative Biology, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA. clauvelin@biomaps.rutgers.edu.
Michael A GrosnerBioMaPS Institute for Quantitative Biology, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA. michaelgrosner@gmail.com.
Andrew V ColasantiBioMaPS Institute for Quantitative Biology, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA. andrewco@rci.rutgers.edu.
Wilma K OlsonBioMaPS Institute for Quantitative Biology, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA. wilma.olson@rutgers.edu.
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey · US

Funding

THEORETICFAL ASPECTS OF DNA SUPERCOILINGR01GM034809 · NIGMS · RUTGERS THE ST UNIV OF NJ NEW BRUNSWICK · PI OLSON, WILMA K · 1985 to 2019
$4.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM34809NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM034809
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The looping of DNA provides a means of communication between sequentially distant genomic sites that operate in tandem to express, copy, and repair the information encoded in the DNA base sequence. The short loops implicated in the expression of bacterial genes suggest that molecular factors other than the naturally stiff double helix are involved in bringing the interacting sites into close spatial proximity. New computational techniques that take direct account of the three-dimensional structures and fluctuations of protein and DNA allow us to examine the likely means of enhancing such communication. Here, we describe the application of these approaches to the looping of a 92 base-pair DNA segment between the headpieces of the tetrameric Escherichia coli Lac repressor protein. The distortions of the double helix induced by a second protein--the nonspecific nucleoid protein HU--increase the computed likelihood of looping by several orders of magnitude over that of DNA alone. Large-scale deformations of the repressor, sequence-dependent features in the DNA loop, and deformability of the DNA operators also enhance looping, although to lesser degrees. The correspondence between the predicted looping propensities and the ease of looping derived from gene-expression and single-molecule measurements lends credence to the derived structural picture.

Indexed as

Molecular Dynamics SimulationAmino Acid SequenceBase SequenceDNA, BacterialEscherichia coli ProteinsLac RepressorsMolecular Sequence DataNucleic Acid ConformationProtein BindingDNA, BacterialEscherichia coli ProteinsLac Repressors

Identifiers

PMID25167135
PMCPMC4200792
OpenAlexW2039937339

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.