ArticlePLoS computational biology2014
VASP-E: specificity annotation with a volumetric analysis of electrostatic isopotentials.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Automatic Explanation of Protein-Protein Binding Mechanism: A Preliminary Study.Computational structural bioinformatics : international workshop, CSBW 2024, Boston, MA, USA, November 16, 2024, proceedings. Computational Structural Bioinformatics Workshop (2024 : Boston, Mass.) · 2025Article
- Article
- Analysis of Protein-Protein Interactions for Intermolecular Bond Prediction.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- A Conical Representation of Hydrogen Bond Geometry for Quantifying Bond Interactions.Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine · 2021Article
- DiffBond: A Method for Predicting Intermolecular Bond Formation.Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine · 2021Article
- Precise parallel volumetric comparison of molecular surfaces and electrostatic isopotentials.Algorithms for molecular biology : AMB · 2020Article
- Computational Structural Biology: Successes, Future Directions, and Challenges.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Review
- Automated shape-based clustering of 3D immunoglobulin protein structures in chronic lymphocytic leukemia.BMC bioinformatics · 2018Article
- Exploring Protein Cavities through Rigidity Analysis.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018Article
- Ricin uses arginine 235 as an anchor residue to bind to P-proteins of the ribosomal stalk.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- DeepVASP-E: A Flexible Analysis of Electrostatic Isopotentials for Finding and Explaining Mechanisms that Control Binding Specificity.Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on BiocomputingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Algorithms for comparing protein structure are frequently used for function annotation. By searching for subtle similarities among very different proteins, these algorithms can identify remote homologs with similar biological functions. In contrast, few comparison algorithms focus on specificity annotation, where the identification of subtle differences among very similar proteins can assist in finding small structural variations that create differences in binding specificity. Few specificity annotation methods consider electrostatic fields, which play a critical role in molecular recognition. To fill this gap, this paper describes VASP-E (Volumetric Analysis of Surface Properties with Electrostatics), a novel volumetric comparison tool based on the electrostatic comparison of protein-ligand and protein-protein binding sites. VASP-E exploits the central observation that three dimensional solids can be used to fully represent and compare both electrostatic isopotentials and molecular surfaces. With this integrated representation, VASP-E is able to dissect the electrostatic environments of protein-ligand and protein-protein binding interfaces, identifying individual amino acids that have an electrostatic influence on binding specificity. VASP-E was used to examine a nonredundant subset of the serine and cysteine proteases as well as the barnase-barstar and Rap1a-raf complexes. Based on amino acids established by various experimental studies to have an electrostatic influence on binding specificity, VASP-E identified electrostatically influential amino acids with 100% precision and 83.3% recall. We also show that VASP-E can accurately classify closely related ligand binding cavities into groups with different binding preferences. These results suggest that VASP-E should prove a useful tool for the characterization of specific binding and the engineering of binding preferences in proteins.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.