Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25165973›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Preliminary validation of direct detection of foot-and-mouth disease virus within clinical samples using reverse transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification coupled with a simple lateral flow device for detection.

Ryan A Waters, Veronica L Fowler, Bryony Armson, Noel Nelson, John Gloster, David J Paton, Donald P King

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Advances in the Diagnosis of Foot-and-Mouth Disease.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2020
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ryan A WatersLivestock Viral Disease Program, The Pirbright Institute, Pirbright, Guildford, Surrey, United Kingdom.
Veronica L FowlerLivestock Viral Disease Program, The Pirbright Institute, Pirbright, Guildford, Surrey, United Kingdom.
Bryony ArmsonLivestock Viral Disease Program, The Pirbright Institute, Pirbright, Guildford, Surrey, United Kingdom.
Noel NelsonAtmospheric Dispersion and Air Quality, The Meteorological Office, Exeter, United Kingdom.
John GlosterAtmospheric Dispersion and Air Quality, The Meteorological Office, Exeter, United Kingdom.
David J PatonLivestock Viral Disease Program, The Pirbright Institute, Pirbright, Guildford, Surrey, United Kingdom.
Donald P KingLivestock Viral Disease Program, The Pirbright Institute, Pirbright, Guildford, Surrey, United Kingdom.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/B/00549
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rapid, field-based diagnostic assays are desirable tools for the control of foot-and-mouth disease (FMD). Current approaches involve either; 1) Detection of FMD virus (FMDV) with immuochromatographic antigen lateral flow devices (LFD), which have relatively low analytical sensitivity, or 2) portable RT-qPCR that has high analytical sensitivity but is expensive. Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) may provide a platform upon which to develop field based assays without these drawbacks. The objective of this study was to modify an FMDV-specific reverse transcription-LAMP (RT-LAMP) assay to enable detection of dual-labelled LAMP products with an LFD, and to evaluate simple sample processing protocols without nucleic acid extraction. The limit of detection of this assay was demonstrated to be equivalent to that of a laboratory based real-time RT-qPCR assay and to have a 10,000 fold higher analytical sensitivity than the FMDV-specific antigen LFD currently used in the field. Importantly, this study demonstrated that FMDV RNA could be detected from epithelial suspensions without the need for prior RNA extraction, utilising a rudimentary heat source for amplification. Once optimised, this RT-LAMP-LFD protocol was able to detect multiple serotypes from field epithelial samples, in addition to detecting FMDV in the air surrounding infected cattle, pigs and sheep, including pre-clinical detection. This study describes the development and evaluation of an assay format, which may be used as a future basis for rapid and low cost detection of FMDV. In addition it provides providing "proof of concept" for the future use of LAMP assays to tackle other challenging diagnostic scenarios encompassing veterinary and human health.

Indexed as

AnimalsCattleFoot-and-Mouth DiseaseFoot-and-Mouth Disease VirusMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesNucleic Acid Amplification TechniquesReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionSensitivity and SpecificitySheepSwine

Identifiers

PMID25165973
PMCPMC4148330

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.