ArticlePeerJ2014
Recent genome reduction of Wolbachia in Drosophila recens targets phage WO and narrows candidates for reproductive parasitism.
Article in PeerJ, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
36 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.
- Discovery of a novelFrontiers in microbiology · 2024Article
- Cross-validation of chemical and genetic disruption approaches to inform host cellular effects onFrontiers in microbiology · 2024Article
- Two Complete Genomes of Male-Killing Wolbachia Infecting Ostrinia Moth Species Illuminate Their Evolutionary Dynamics and Association with Hosts.Microbial ecology · 2023Article
- The Transmission Patterns of the EndosymbiontGenes · 2023Article
- Combined actions of bacteriophage-encoded genes iniScience · 2023Article
- Distinct Wolbachia localization patterns in oocytes of diverse host species reveal multiple strategies of maternal transmission.Genetics · 2023Article
- Widespread phages of endosymbionts: Phage WO genomics and the proposed taxonomic classification of Symbioviridae.PLoS genetics · 2022Article
- Genomic Signatures of Recent Adaptation in a Wild Bumblebee.Molecular biology and evolution · 2022Article
- Positive Selection and Horizontal Gene Transfer in the Genome of a Male-Killing Wolbachia.Molecular biology and evolution · 2022Article
- Two Newly IntroducedApplied and environmental microbiology · 2021Article
- A single synonymous nucleotide change impacts the male-killing phenotype of prophage WO geneeLife · 2021Article
- The impact of artificial selection for Wolbachia-mediated dengue virus blocking on phage WO.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2021Article
- Mechanistically comparing reproductive manipulations caused by selfish chromosomes and bacterial symbionts.Heredity · 2021Review
- The impacts of cytoplasmic incompatibility factor (cifA and cifB) genetic variation on phenotypes.Genetics · 2021Article
- Review
- Parallel Sequencing of Wolbachia wCer2 from Donor and Novel Hosts Reveals Multiple Incompatibility Factors and Genome Stability after Host Transfers.Genome biology and evolution · 2020Article
- Article
- Article
- Distribution and Evolution of the Bacteriophage WO and Its Antagonism WithFrontiers in microbiology · 2020Article
- Evolution ofPeerJ · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Wolbachia are maternally transmitted endosymbionts that often alter their arthropod hosts' biology to favor the success of infected females, and they may also serve as a speciation microbe driving reproductive isolation. Two of these host manipulations include killing males outright and reducing offspring survival when infected males mate with uninfected females, a phenomenon known as cytoplasmic incompatibility. Little is known about the mechanisms behind these phenotypes, but interestingly either effect can be caused by the same Wolbachia strain when infecting different hosts. For instance, wRec causes cytoplasmic incompatibility in its native host Drosophila recens and male killing in D. subquinaria. The discovery of prophage WO elements in most arthropod Wolbachia has generated the hypothesis that WO may encode genes involved in these reproductive manipulations. However, PCR screens for the WO minor capsid gene indicated that wRec lacks phage WO. Thus, wRec seemed to provide an example where phage WO is not needed for Wolbachia-induced reproductive manipulation. To enable investigation of the mechanism of phenotype switching in different host backgrounds, and to examine the unexpected absence of phage WO, we sequenced the genome of wRec. Analyses reveal that wRec diverged from wMel approximately 350,000 years ago, mainly by genome reduction in the phage regions. While it lost the minor capsid gene used in standard PCR screens for phage WO, it retained two regions encompassing 33 genes, several of which have previously been associated with reproductive parasitism. Thus, WO gene involvement in reproductive manipulation cannot be excluded and reliance on single gene PCR should not be used to rule out the presence of phage WO in Wolbachia. Additionally, the genome sequence for wRec will enable transcriptomic and proteomic studies that may help elucidate the Wolbachia mechanisms of altered reproductive manipulations associated with host switching, perhaps among the 33 remaining phage genes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.