ArticlePeerJ2014
The relationship between managed bees and the prevalence of parasites in bumblebees.
Article in PeerJ, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
45 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Do managed bees have negative effects on wild bees?: A systematic review of the literature.PloS one · 2017Pooled it
- Bumble Bees and Honey Bees on Islands Harbour Reduced Viral Species Richness, Yet Honey Bee Populations Are Dominated by a Deformed Wing Virus Recombinant.Molecular ecology · 2025Article
- How Population Structure and Nest Membership Shape Pathogen Patterns in Bumble Bees.Molecular ecology · 2025Article
- Review
- The Role of Pathogens in Bumblebee Decline: A Review.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Urbanization Shifts Immunometabolism in a Common Bumblebee.Ecology and evolution · 2024Article
- Tracking Existing Factors Directly Affecting the Reproduction of Bumblebees: Current Knowledge.Insects · 2024Review
- Host species and geography impact bee-associated RNA virus communities with evidence for isolation by distance in viral populations.ISME communications · 2024Article
- The gut microbiome of solitary bees is mainly affected by pathogen assemblage and partially by land use.Environmental microbiome · 2023Article
- Endosymbionts that threaten commercially raised and wild bumble bees (Journal of pollination ecology · 2023Article
- Review
- Article
- Article
- Detection ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Effects of planted pollinator habitat on pathogen prevalence and interspecific detection between bee species.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Expanding insect pollinators in the Anthropocene.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2021Review
- Transitions in symbiosis: evidence for environmental acquisition and social transmission within a clade of heritable symbionts.The ISME journal · 2021Article
- Conservation genomics reveals pesticide and pathogen exposure in the declining bumble bee Bombus terricola.Molecular ecology · 2021Article
- Pathogens Spillover from Honey Bees to Other Arthropods.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- The Pathogens Spillover and Incidence Correlation in Bumblebees and Honeybees in Slovenia.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Honey bees and, more recently, bumblebees have been domesticated and are now managed commercially primarily for crop pollination, mixing with wild pollinators during foraging on shared flower resources. There is mounting evidence that managed honey bees or commercially produced bumblebees may affect the health of wild pollinators such as bumblebees by increasing competition for resources and the prevalence of parasites in wild bees. Here we screened 764 bumblebees from around five greenhouses that either used commercially produced bumblebees or did not, as well as bumblebees from 10 colonies placed at two sites either close to or far from a honey bee apiary, for the parasites Apicystis bombi, Crithidia bombi, Nosema bombi, N. ceranae, N. apis and deformed wing virus. We found that A. bombi and C. bombi were more prevalent around greenhouses using commercially produced bumblebees, while C. bombi was 18% more prevalent in bumblebees at the site near to the honey bee apiary than those at the site far from the apiary. Whilst these results are from only a limited number of sites, they support previous reports of parasite spillover from commercially produced bumblebees to wild bumblebees, and suggest that the impact of stress from competing with managed bees or the vectoring of parasites by them on parasite prevalence in wild bees needs further investigation. It appears increasingly likely that the use of managed bees comes at a cost of increased parasites in wild bumblebees, which is not only a concern for bumblebee conservation, but which may impact other pollinators as well.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.