Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25165623›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2014

Human hair shaft proteomic profiling: individual differences, site specificity and cuticle analysis.

Chelsea N Laatsch, Blythe P Durbin-Johnson, David M Rocke, Sophie Mukwana, Abby B Newland, Michael J Flagler, Michael G Davis, Richard A Eigenheer, Brett S Phinney, Robert H Rice

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Proteomic Analysis of Single Hairs.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Comparative study of male and female human hair: A microscopic analysis.Journal of advanced pharmaceutical technology & research · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Chelsea N LaatschForensic Science Graduate Program and Department of Environmental Toxicology, University of California , Davis, CA , USA.
Blythe P Durbin-JohnsonDivision of Biostatistics, Department of Public Health Sciences, Clinical and Translational Science Center Biostatistics Core, University of California , Davis, CA , USA.
David M RockeDivision of Biostatistics, Department of Public Health Sciences, Clinical and Translational Science Center Biostatistics Core, University of California , Davis, CA , USA.
Sophie MukwanaBiotech Forensics , Nairobi , Kenya.
Abby B NewlandProcter & Gamble, Mason Business Center , Mason, OH , USA.
Michael J FlaglerProcter & Gamble, Mason Business Center , Mason, OH , USA.
Michael G DavisProcter & Gamble, Mason Business Center , Mason, OH , USA.
Richard A EigenheerProteomics Core Facility, University of California , Davis, CA , USA.
Brett S PhinneyProteomics Core Facility, University of California , Davis, CA , USA.
Robert H RiceForensic Science Graduate Program and Department of Environmental Toxicology, University of California , Davis, CA , USA.
University of California, Davis · USProcter & Gamble (United States) · US

Funding

Workshop on Environmental Technology Transfer and EntrepreneurshipP42ES004699 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI HAMMOCK, BRUCE D · 1987 to 2021
$50.1M
UC Davis Clinical and Translational Science CenterUL1TR000002 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI BERGLUND, LARS F · 2012 to 2015
$12.2M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000002NIEHS NIH HHS P42 ES004699
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hair from different individuals can be distinguished by physical properties. Although some data exist on other species, examination of the individual molecular differences within the human hair shaft has not been thoroughly investigated. Shotgun proteomic analysis revealed considerable variation in profile among samples from Caucasian, African-American, Kenyan and Korean subjects. Within these ethnic groups, prominent keratin proteins served to distinguish individual profiles. Differences between ethnic groups, less marked, relied to a large extent on levels of keratin associated proteins. In samples from Caucasian subjects, hair shafts from axillary, beard, pubic and scalp regions exhibited distinguishable profiles, with the last being most different from the others. Finally, the profile of isolated hair cuticle cells was distinguished from that of total hair shaft by levels of more than 20 proteins, the majority of which were prominent keratins. The cuticle also exhibited relatively high levels of epidermal transglutaminase (TGM3), accounting for its observed low degree of protein extraction by denaturants. In addition to providing insight into hair structure, present findings may lead to improvements in differentiating hair from various ethnic origins and offer an approach to extending use of hair in crime scene evidence for distinguishing among individuals.

Indexed as

AncestryBody siteCorneocytesDifferential expressionForensic evidenceKeratin associated proteinsKeratinsProteomicsTransglutaminase

Identifiers

PMID25165623
PMCPMC4137660
OpenAlexW2010544129

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.