ReviewF1000prime reports2014
Different yet similar: evolution of imprinting in flowering plants and mammals.
Review in F1000prime reports, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.
- Bioinformatics insights into plant genomic imprinting: approaches, challenges, and future perspectives.Briefings in functional genomics · 2026Review
- The Demographic History of Populations and Genomic Imprinting have Shaped the Transposon Patterns in Arabidopsis lyrata.Molecular biology and evolution · 2025Article
- United by conflict: Convergent signatures of parental conflict in angiosperms and placental mammals.The Journal of heredity · 2024Review
- Multilayered epigenetic control of persistent and stage-specific imprinted genes in rice endosperm.Nature plants · 2024Article
- Imprinted genes and the manipulation of parenting in mammals.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2023Review
- Mechanisms of Intrinsic Postzygotic Isolation: From Traditional Genic and Chromosomal Views to Genomic and Epigenetic Perspectives.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2023Review
- RNA Pol IV induces antagonistic parent-of-origin effects on Arabidopsis endosperm.PLoS biology · 2022Article
- Epigenetic modifications potentially controlling the allelic expression of imprinted genes in sunflower endosperm.BMC plant biology · 2021Article
- Divergence among rice cultivars reveals roles for transposition and epimutation in ongoing evolution of genomic imprinting.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021Article
- The Polycomb group protein MEDEA controls cell proliferation and embryonic patterning in Arabidopsis.Developmental cell · 2021Article
- OsYUC11-mediated auxin biosynthesis is essential for endosperm development of rice.Plant physiology · 2021Article
- Article
- Genomic imprinting in plants-revisiting existing models.Genes & development · 2020Review
- Genomic imprinting and its effects on postnatal growth and adult metabolism.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2019Review
- Consistent Reanalysis of Genome-wide Imprinting Studies in Plants Using Generalized Linear Models Increases Concordance across Datasets.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Characterization of Imprinted Genes in Rice Reveals Conservation of Regulation and Imprinting with Other Plant Species.Plant physiology · 2018Article
- Genomic Imprinting Was Evolutionarily Conserved during Wheat Polyploidization.The Plant cell · 2018Article
- Article
- Developmental transitions: integrating environmental cues with hormonal signaling in the chromatin landscape in plants.Genome biology · 2017Review
- The coadaptation theory for genomic imprinting.Evolution letters · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Genomic imprinting refers to a form of epigenetic gene regulation whereby alleles are differentially expressed in a parent-of-origin-dependent manner. Imprinting evolved independently in flowering plants and in therian mammals in association with the elaboration of viviparity and a placental habit. Despite the striking differences in plant and animal reproduction, genomic imprinting shares multiple characteristics between them. In both groups, imprinted expression is controlled, at least in part, by DNA methylation and chromatin modifications in cis-regulatory regions, and many maternally and paternally expressed genes display complementary dosage-dependent effects during embryogenesis. This suggests that genomic imprinting evolved in response to similar selective pressures in flowering plants and mammals. Nevertheless, there are important differences between plant and animal imprinting. In particular, genomic imprinting has been shown to be more flexible and evolutionarily labile in plants. In mammals, imprinted genes are organized mainly in highly conserved clusters, whereas in plants they occur in isolation throughout the genome and are affected by local gene duplications. There is a large degree of intra- and inter-specific variation in imprinted gene expression in plants. These differences likely reflect the distinct life cycles and the different evolutionary dynamics that shape plant and animal genomes.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.