Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25165546›Full record

ReviewTherapeutic advances in infectious disease2013

Invasive fungal infections in transplant recipients.

Jose A Vazquez, Marisa H Miceli, George Alangaden

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Therapeutic advances in infectious disease, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. A Comparison of Candida Detection in Sputum by the Conventional Culture and Fluorescent Polymerase Chain Reaction Methods.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Overcoming antifungal resistance.Drug discovery today. Technologies · 2014
    Review
  18. Invasive Fungal Disease in Solid Organ and Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Recipients, United States.Transplant infectious disease : an official journal of the Transplantation Society
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jose A VazquezDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, 2799 West Grand Blvd, CFP-202, Detroit, MI 48202, USA.
Marisa H MiceliDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA.
George AlangadenDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Invasive fungal infections are an important cause of morbidity and mortality in hematopoietic stem cell transplant and solid organ transplant recipients. Evolving transplant modalities and techniques, complex and extensive immunosuppressant strategies, and the increased use of broad spectrum antifungal prophylaxis has greatly impacted the epidemiology and temporal pattern of invasive fungal infections in the transplant population. The goal of this article is to provide an up-to-date review of the most commonly encountered invasive fungal infections seen in transplant recipients, including epidemiology, risk factors, clinical features, diagnostic dilemmas, management and their overall influence on outcomes.

Indexed as

antifungal agentsAspergillusCandidaMucortransplant recipients

Identifiers

PMID25165546
PMCPMC4040723

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.