Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25165138›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology of the cell2014

Contrasting phagosome pH regulation and maturation in human M1 and M2 macrophages.

Johnathan Canton, Rojyar Khezri, Michael Glogauer, Sergio Grinstein

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology of the cell, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 124 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
124citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

124 citing papers in PubMed, 216 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Hv1 channel in immune cells and pharmacology.Pharmacological research · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

64 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Johnathan CantonProgram in Cell Biology, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON M5G 0A4, Canada.
Rojyar KhezriProgram in Cell Biology, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON M5G 0A4, Canada.
Michael GlogauerFaculty of Dentistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5G 1G6, Canada.
Sergio GrinsteinProgram in Cell Biology, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON M5G 0A4, Canada Keenan Research Centre of the Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON M5C 1N8, Canada sergio.grinstein@sickkids.ca.
Hospital for Sick Children · CASt. Michael's Hospital · CAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research MOP7075Canadian Institutes of Health Research MOP93634Canadian Institutes of Health Research TBO-122068
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Macrophages respond to changes in environmental stimuli by assuming distinct functional phenotypes, a phenomenon referred to as macrophage polarization. We generated classically (M1) and alternatively (M2) polarized macrophages--two extremes of the polarization spectrum--to compare the properties of their phagosomes. Specifically, we analyzed the regulation of the luminal pH after particle engulfment. The phagosomes of M1 macrophages had a similar buffering power and proton (equivalent) leakage permeability but significantly reduced proton-pumping activity compared with M2 phagosomes. As a result, only the latter underwent a rapid and profound acidification. By contrast, M1 phagosomes displayed alkaline pH oscillations, which were caused by proton consumption upon dismutation of superoxide, followed by activation of a voltage- and Zn(2+)-sensitive permeation pathway, likely HV1 channels. The paucity of V-ATPases in M1 phagosomes was associated with, and likely caused by, delayed fusion with late endosomes and lysosomes. The delayed kinetics of maturation was, in turn, promoted by the failure of M1 phagosomes to acidify. Thus, in M1 cells, elimination of pathogens through deployment of the microbicidal NADPH oxidase is given priority at the expense of delayed acidification. By contrast, M2 phagosomes proceed to acidify immediately in order to clear apoptotic bodies rapidly and effectively.

Indexed as

HumansHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationIon ChannelsLysosomesMacrophagesMembrane GlycoproteinsNADPH Oxidase 2NADPH OxidasesPhagosomesReactive Oxygen SpeciesVacuolar Proton-Translocating ATPasesCYBB protein, humanHVCN1 protein, humanIon ChannelsMembrane GlycoproteinsNADPH Oxidase 2NADPH OxidasesReactive Oxygen SpeciesVacuolar Proton-Translocating ATPases

Identifiers

PMID25165138
PMCPMC4214780
OpenAlexW2323206703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.