Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25165083›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2014

An international, prospective, multicenter evaluation of the combination of AdvanDx Staphylococcus QuickFISH BC with mecA XpressFISH for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates from positive blood cultures.

H Salimnia, M R Fairfax, P Lephart, M Morgan, J J Gilbreath, S M Butler-Wu, K E Templeton, F J Hamilton, F Wu, R Buckner and 7 more

Abstract readEvaluation StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Modern Tools for Rapid Diagnostics of Antimicrobial Resistance.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2020
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Diagnostic Molecular Microbiology: A 2018 Snapshot.Clinics in laboratory medicine · 2018
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

H SalimniaDetroit Medical Center University Laboratories, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
M R FairfaxDetroit Medical Center University Laboratories, Detroit, Michigan, USA mfairfax@dmc.org.
P LephartDetroit Medical Center University Laboratories, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
M MorganCedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.
J J GilbreathUniversity of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
S M Butler-WuUniversity of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
K E TempletonRoyal Infirmary, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
F J HamiltonRoyal Infirmary, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
F WuColumbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
R BucknerIndiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
D FullerIndiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
T E DavisIndiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
A M AbdelhamedCase Western Reserve University and University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
M R JacobsCase Western Reserve University and University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
A MillerJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
B PfrommerJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
K C CarrollJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sepsis caused by Staphylococcus aureus is a major health problem worldwide. Better outcomes are achieved when rapid diagnosis and determination of methicillin susceptibility enable early optimization of antimicrobial therapy. Eight large clinical laboratories, seven from the United States and one from Scotland, evaluated the combination of the Staphylococcus QuickFISH BC and the new mecA XpressFISH assay (both AdvanDx, Woburn, MA, USA) for the detection of methicillin-resistant S. aureus in positive blood cultures. Blood cultures flagged as positive by automated blood culture instruments and demonstrating only Gram-positive cocci in clusters on Gram stain were tested by QuickFISH, a 20-min assay. If only S. aureus was detected, mecA XpressFISH testing followed. The recovered S. aureus isolates were tested by cefoxitin disk diffusion as the reference method. The QuickFISH assay results were concordant with the routine phenotypic testing methods of the testing laboratories in 1,211/1,221 (99.1%) samples and detected 488/491 S. aureus organisms (sensitivity, 99.4%; specificity, 99.6%). Approximately 60% of the samples (730) contained coagulase-negative staphylococci or nonstaphylococci as assessed by the QuickFISH assay and were not tested further. The 458 compliant samples positive exclusively for S. aureus by the QuickFISH assay were tested by the mecA XpressFISH assay, which detected 209 of 211 methicillin-resistant S. aureus organisms (sensitivity, 99.1%; specificity, 99.6%). The mecA XpressFISH assay also showed high reproducibility, with 534/540 tests performed by 6 operators over 5 days achieving reproducible results (98.9% agreement). The combination of the Staphylococcus QuickFISH BC and mecA XpressFISH assays is sensitive, specific, and reproducible for the detection of methicillin-resistant S. aureus and yields complete results in 2 h after the blood culture turns positive.

Indexed as

Bacteriological TechniquesBloodHumansIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesReproducibility of ResultsScotlandSensitivity and SpecificitySepsisStaphylococcal InfectionsUnited States

Identifiers

PMID25165083
PMCPMC4313227

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.