Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25164765›Full record

ArticleGenome biology2014

Comparative sequencing analysis reveals high genomic concordance between matched primary and metastatic colorectal cancer lesions.

A Rose Brannon, Efsevia Vakiani, Brooke E Sylvester, Sasinya N Scott, Gregory McDermott, Ronak H Shah, Krishan Kania, Agnes Viale, Dayna M Oschwald, Vladimir Vacic and 10 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 231 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
231citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
16.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

231 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 382 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

171 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

A Rose Brannon
Efsevia Vakiani
Brooke E Sylvester
Sasinya N Scott
Gregory McDermott
Ronak H Shah
Krishan Kania
Agnes Viale
Dayna M Oschwald
Vladimir Vacic
Anne-Katrin Emde
Andrea Cercek
Rona Yaeger
Nancy E Kemeny
Leonard B Saltz
Jinru Shia
Michael I D'Angelica
Martin R Weiser
David B Solit
Michael F Berger
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USNew York Genome Center · USCornell University · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Summer research experiences for medical students supervised by faculty mentorsR25CA020449 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Charlotte Eielson Ariyan · 1985 to 2026
$6.2M
Translational Research in Oncology Training ProgramT32CA160001 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI SAWYERS, CHARLES L. · 2011 to 2020
$2.0M
Biological characterization of matched primary colorectal carcinomas & metastasesK08CA175150 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI VAKIANI, EFSEVIA · 2013 to 2017
$894k
NCI NIH HHS 1K08CA175150-01A1NCI NIH HHS K08 CA175150NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS R25 CA020449NCI NIH HHS T32 CA160001NCI NIH HHS T32CA160001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundColorectal cancer is the second leading cause of cancer death in the United States, with over 50,000 deaths estimated in 2014. Molecular profiling for somatic mutations that predict absence of response to anti-EGFR therapy has become standard practice in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer; however, the quantity and type of tissue available for testing is frequently limited. Further, the degree to which the primary tumor is a faithful representation of metastatic disease has been questioned. As next-generation sequencing technology becomes more widely available for clinical use and additional molecularly targeted agents are considered as treatment options in colorectal cancer, it is important to characterize the extent of tumor heterogeneity between primary and metastatic tumors.

resultsWe performed deep coverage, targeted next-generation sequencing of 230 key cancer-associated genes for 69 matched primary and metastatic tumors and normal tissue. Mutation profiles were 100% concordant for KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF, and were highly concordant for recurrent alterations in colorectal cancer. Additionally, whole genome sequencing of four patient trios did not reveal any additional site-specific targetable alterations.

conclusionsColorectal cancer primary tumors and metastases exhibit high genomic concordance. As current clinical practices in colorectal cancer revolve around KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF mutation status, diagnostic sequencing of either primary or metastatic tissue as available is acceptable for most patients. Additionally, consistency between targeted sequencing and whole genome sequencing results suggests that targeted sequencing may be a suitable strategy for clinical diagnostic applications.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAlcohol OxidoreductasesColorectal NeoplasmsFemaleGenome, HumanGTP PhosphohydrolasesHEK293 CellsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMaleMembrane ProteinsMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisProto-Oncogene ProteinsAlcohol OxidoreductasesBRAF protein, humanGTP PhosphohydrolasesKRAS protein, humanlactate-malate transhydrogenaseMembrane ProteinsNRAS protein, humanProto-Oncogene ProteinsProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)ras Proteins

Identifiers

PMID25164765
PMCPMC4189196
OpenAlexW2135449254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.