ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2014
A model of the medial superior olive explains spatiotemporal features of local field potentials.
Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neural Maps of Interaural Time Difference in the American Alligator: A Stable Feature in Modern Archosaurs.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019Article
- The Calyx of Held: A Hypothesis on the Need for Reliable Timing in an Intensity-Difference Encoder.Neuron · 2018Review
- Contribution of action potentials to the extracellular field potential in the nucleus laminaris of barn owl.Journal of neurophysiology · 2018Article
- Signatures of Somatic Inhibition and Dendritic Excitation in Auditory Brainstem Field Potentials.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2017Article
- Article
- Neural Correlates of the Binaural Masking Level Difference in Human Frequency-Following Responses.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2017Article
- The Binaural Interaction Component in Barn Owl (Tyto alba) Presents few Differences to Mammalian Data.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2016Article
- Neuronal coupling by endogenous electric fields: cable theory and applications to coincidence detector neurons in the auditory brain stem.Journal of neurophysiology · 2016Article
- Maps of interaural delay in the owl's nucleus laminaris.Journal of neurophysiology · 2015Article
- Change in the coding of interaural time difference along the tonotopic axis of the chicken nucleus laminaris.Frontiers in neural circuits · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Local field potentials are important indicators of in vivo neural activity. Sustained, phase-locked, sound-evoked extracellular fields in the mammalian auditory brainstem, known as the auditory neurophonic, reflect the activity of neurons in the medial superior olive (MSO). We develop a biophysically based model of the neurophonic that accounts for features of in vivo extracellular recordings in the cat auditory brainstem. By making plausible idealizations regarding the spatial symmetry of MSO neurons and the temporal synchrony of their afferent inputs, we reduce the challenging problem of computing extracellular potentials in a 3D volume conductor to a one-dimensional problem. We find that postsynaptic currents in bipolar MSO neuron models generate extracellular voltage responses that strikingly resemble in vivo recordings. Simulations reproduce distinctive spatiotemporal features of the in vivo neurophonic response to monaural pure tones: large oscillations (hundreds of microvolts to millivolts), broad spatial reach (millimeter scale), and a dipole-like spatial profile. We also explain how somatic inhibition and the relative timing of bilateral excitation may shape the spatial profile of the neurophonic. We observe in simulations, and find supporting evidence in in vivo data, that coincident excitatory inputs on both dendrites lead to a drastically reduced spatial reach of the neurophonic. This outcome surprises because coincident inputs are thought to evoke maximal firing rates in MSO neurons, and it reconciles previously puzzling evoked potential results in humans and animals. The success of our model, which has no axon or spike-generating sodium currents, suggests that MSO spikes do not contribute appreciably to the neurophonic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.