Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25164657›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2014

Dynamic fidelity control to the central auditory system: synergistic glycine/GABAergic inhibition in the cochlear nucleus.

Jana Nerlich, Thomas Kuenzel, Christian Keine, Andrej Korenic, Rudolf Rübsamen, Ivan Milenkovic

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. KvThe Journal of physiology · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Corelease of Inhibitory Neurotransmitters in the Mouse Auditory Midbrain.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2017
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. High Entrainment Constrains Synaptic Depression Levels of anFrontiers in computational neuroscience · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jana NerlichFaculty of Biosciences, Pharmacy and Psychology, University of Leipzig, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.
Thomas KuenzelInstitute of Biology 2, RWTH Aachen University, 52062 Aachen, Germany.
Christian KeineFaculty of Biosciences, Pharmacy and Psychology, University of Leipzig, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.
Andrej KorenicCentre for Laser Microscopy, Department of Physiology and Biochemistry, Faculty of Biology, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia, and.
Rudolf RübsamenFaculty of Biosciences, Pharmacy and Psychology, University of Leipzig, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.
Ivan MilenkovicCarl Ludwig Institute for Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Leipzig, 04103 Leipzig, Germany Ivan.Milenkovic@medizin.uni-leipzig.de.
Leipzig University · DEUniversity of Belgrade · RS

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

GABA and glycine are the major inhibitory transmitters that attune neuronal activity in the CNS of mammals. The respective transmitters are mostly spatially separated, that is, synaptic inhibition in the forebrain areas is mediated by GABA, whereas glycine is predominantly used in the brainstem. Accordingly, inhibition in auditory brainstem circuits is largely mediated by glycine, but there are few auditory synapses using both transmitters in maturity. Little is known about physiological advantages of such a two-transmitter inhibitory mechanism. We explored the benefit of engaging both glycine and GABA with inhibition at the endbulb of Held-spherical bushy cell synapse in the auditory brainstem of juvenile Mongolian gerbils. This model synapse enables selective in vivo activation of excitatory and inhibitory neuronal inputs through systemic sound stimulation and precise analysis of the input (endbulb of Held) output (spherical bushy cell) function. The combination of in vivo and slice electrophysiology revealed that the dynamic AP inhibition in spherical bushy cells closely matches the inhibitory conductance profile determined by the glycine-R and GABAA-R. The slow and potent glycinergic component dominates the inhibitory conductance, thereby primarily accounting for its high-pass filter properties. GABAergic transmission enhances the inhibitory strength and shapes its duration in an activity-dependent manner, thus increasing the inhibitory potency to suppress the excitation through the endbulb of Held. Finally, in silico modeling provides a strong link between in vivo and slice data by simulating the interactions between the endbulb- and the synergistic glycine-GABA-conductances during in vivo-like spontaneous and sound evoked activities.

Indexed as

Acoustic StimulationAnimalsAuditory PathwaysAuditory PerceptionCochlear NucleusFemalegamma-Aminobutyric AcidGerbillinaeGlycineMaleModels, NeurologicalNeural InhibitionOrgan Culture TechniquesPatch-Clamp TechniquesSynapsesgamma-Aminobutyric AcidGlycineAP inhibitionauditory signal processingGABAA/glycine receptorsin vivo electrophysiologymodelingslice electrophysiology

Identifiers

PMID25164657
PMCPMC6608417
OpenAlexW2089575842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.