ArticleJournal of translational medicine2014
Genetics and primary care: where are we headed?
Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- A systematic review of interventions to provide genetics education for primary care.BMC family practice · 2016Pooled it
- Increasing confidence and changing behaviors in primary care providers engaged in genetic counselling.BMC medical education · 2017Trial
- Navigating the uncertainty of precision cancer screening: The role of shared decision-making.PEC innovation · 2023Article
- Barriers and strategies to integrate medical genetics and primary care in underserved populations: a scoping review.Journal of community genetics · 2021Article
- A comparative study of patients' perceptions of genetic and genomic medicine services in California and Malaysia.Journal of community genetics · 2019Article
- Family health history and genetic services-the East Baltimore community stakeholder interview project.Journal of community genetics · 2019Article
- GP attitudes to and expectations for providing personal genomic risk information to the public: a qualitative study.BJGP open · 2019Article
- Genomics-informed weight management in primary care: anticipated public interest.Personalized medicine · 2018Article
- Implementing genetic education in primary care: the Gen-Equip programme.Journal of community genetics · 2017Article
- Personalized cancer screening: helping primary care rise to the challenge.Public health reviewsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Since first sequencing the human genome in 2003, emerging genetic/genomic technologies have ushered in a revolutionary era of medicine that purports to bridge molecular biology and clinical care. The field of translational medicine is charged with mediating this revolution. Sequencing innovations are far outpacing guidelines intended to ease their practice-based applications, including in primary care. As a result, genomic medicine's full integration in primary care settings especially, has been slow to materialize. Researchers and clinicians alike face substantial challenges in navigating contentious ethical issues raised in translation and implementation, namely preserving the spirit of whole-person approaches to care; maintaining respect for persons and communities; and translating genetic risk into clinical actionability. This commentary therefore explores practical barriers to, and ethical implications of, incorporating genomic technologies in the primary care sector. These ethical challenges are both philosophical and infrastructural. From a primary care perspective, the commentary further reviews the ethical, legal and social implications of the Center for Disease Control's proposed model for assessing the validity and utility of genomic testing and family health history applications. Lastly, the authors provide recommendations for future translational initiatives that aim to maximize the capacities of genomic medicine, without compromising primary care philosophies and foundations of practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.