Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25164439›Full record

ArticleEuropean biophysics journal : EBJ2014

Preferential DNA photocleavage potency of Zn(II) over Ni(II) derivatives of carboxymethyl tetracationic porphyrin: the role of the mode of binding to DNA.

Oxana A Kovaleva, Vladimir B Tsvetkov, Olga K Mamaeva, Valentina A Ol'shevskaya, Anton V Makarenkov, Lyubov G Dezhenkova, Alexander S Semeikin, Olga F Borisova, Alexander A Shtil, Anna K Shchyolkina and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European biophysics journal : EBJ, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Oxana A KovalevaEngelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, 119991, Russia.
Vladimir B Tsvetkov
Olga K Mamaeva
Valentina A Ol'shevskaya
Anton V Makarenkov
Lyubov G Dezhenkova
Alexander S Semeikin
Olga F Borisova
Alexander A Shtil
Anna K Shchyolkina
Dmitry N Kaluzhny
Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology · RUA. N. Nesmeyanov Institute of Organoelement Compounds · RUA.V. Topchiev Institute of Petrochemical Synthesis · RUGause Institute of New Antibiotics Russian Academy of Medical Sciences · RUIvanovo State University of Chemistry and Technology · RUMoscow Institute of Physics and Technology · RUNational Research Nuclear University MEPhI · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The porphyrin-based photosensitizers capable of binding to DNA are perspective drug candidates. Here we report the interactions with calf thymus DNA of 5,10,15,20-tetrakis(N-carboxymethyl-4-pyridinium)porphyrin (P1) and its derivatives containing Zn(II) or Ni(II) in the coordination sphere. These interactions were studied with absorption and circular dichroism spectroscopy. NiP1 and ZnP1 formed different types of complexes with DNA. NiP1 intercalated into the double helix, whereas ZnP1 bound the DNA groove. Compound P1 displayed both binding modes. The ZnP1-DNA binding constant was approximately three times smaller than the respective values for P1-DNA and NiP1-DNA complexes. Light induced degradation of the reactive oxygen species (ROS) trap 1,3-diphenylisobenzofuran in the presence of P1 and its metal derivatives revealed that NiP1 was a weaker photooxidative agent, whereas P1 and ZnP1 generated ROS to similar extents. Nevertheless, the DNA photodamaging effect of ZnP1 was the most pronounced. Illumination of the supercoiled plasmid caused single-strand DNA photocleavage in the presence of P1 and ZnP1; double strand breaks were detectable with micromolar concentrations of ZnP1. The concentration of ZnP1 required for plasmid photonicking was two times smaller than that of P1 and ~20 times lower than that for NiP1. Thus, the modes of P1, NiP1 and ZnP1 binding to DNA determine the differential photodamaging potency of these porphyrins. A greater accessibility to the solvent of the groove binder ZnP1, compared to the shielded intercalator NiP1 and the intercalated P1 molecules, allows for an efficient local generation of ROS followed by DNA photocleavage.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceDNA, Single-StrandedMetalloporphyrinsMolecular Docking SimulationMolecular Sequence DataNickelPhotosensitizing AgentsPyridinium CompoundsUltraviolet RaysZincDNA, Single-StrandedMetalloporphyrinsNickelPhotosensitizing AgentsPyridinium CompoundsZinc

Identifiers

PMID25164439
OpenAlexW1996788109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.