ArticlePaediatric drugs2014
Statin use in Australian children: a retrospective audit of four pediatric hospitals.
Article in Paediatric drugs, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimThe aim of this study was to perform an audit of the use of statins in Australian pediatric hospitals.
methodsA retrospective audit of patients prescribed statins during a visit to a pediatric hospital, as in- or outpatients, was performed in four major children's hospitals in three Australian states. Patients were identified through hospital pharmacy dispensing records. Statin use (dose, type) as well as medical history was recorded.
resultsA total of 157 patients under the age of 18 were included in the audit. The most common reasons for being prescribed a statin included history of organ transplantation, renal disease and familial hypercholesterolemia (FH). Four statins were prescribed: atorvastatin (n = 77), pravastatin (n = 45), simvastatin (n = 25) and rosuvastatin (n = 10). All statins, apart from rosuvastatin, were used in very young children (1-7 years old). Polypharmacy was common in these patients, including combinations with calcineurin inhibitors and diltiazem, which can increase systemic statin exposure. A small number of very young children were prescribed high doses of statin, based on mg/kg dosing.
conclusionsStatins were prescribed to children younger than suggested by current Australian guidelines, with atorvastatin being the preferred statin of choice. Long-term safety studies on the use of statins in children have only included FH patients so far, who are generally healthy besides their raised lipid levels. Further long-term safety studies are needed to include the more vulnerable transplant and renal patients, identified in this audit as being prescribed statins. This can help formulate guidelines for the safest possible use of this class of drugs in the pediatric setting, including the possibility of weight-based recommendations for younger children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.