ArticleHeart and vessels2016
Pulse wave analysis of the aortic pressure waveform in patients with vasovagal syncope.
Article in Heart and vessels, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- An analysis of vascular properties using pulse wave analysis in patients with vasovagal syncope.Clinical cardiology · 2020Article
- Hemodynamic response during standing test after blood donation can predict the late phase vasovagal reaction.Heart and vessels · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Vascular reflex mechanisms contribute to vasovagal syncope. However, the alterations in central haemodynamics in patients with vasovagal syncope are unknown. 30 consecutive patients (36.5 ± 15 years, 14 females) with recurrent vasovagal syncope (VVS) and a positive tilt table test were compared to 39 age- and sex-matched controls (36.9 ± 16 years, 15 females) with a negative tilt table result and no history of syncope. Central aortic pressure parameters including augmentation index and central pulse pressure as markers of aortic stiffness were generated non-invasively by applanation tonometry of the radial artery and use of a validated mathematical transfer function. No difference in aortic augmentation index was observed between groups. (VVS 9 ± 2.6 vs. Control 11 ± 2.4, p = 0.8). However, in patients with vasovagal syncope the aortic pressure waveform significantly differed from healthy controls. A prolonged time to the peak of aortic pressure wave (aortic T2) was observed in patients with vasovagal syncope (226 ± 24 vs. 208 ± 21 ms, p = 0.001). Furthermore time to the first shoulder of the aortic pressure wave (aortic T1) was slightly shorter compared to healthy controls, but did not reach statistical significance (106 ± 22 vs. 110 ± 12 ms, p = 0.33). Patients with vasovagal syncope have an altered aortic pressure waveform at rest, but no signs of elevated aortic stiffness. The underlying mechanisms for these findings may potentially result from a complex imbalance of the autonomic nervous system with a continuous deregulation of the sympathetic and parasympathetic reflex arcs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.