Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25164043›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of urology2015

Accuracy in detecting and measuring residual fragments with the Uro Dyna-CT.

B Meister, M C Rassweiler, C Weiß, A Häcker, M Ritter

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of urology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Use of the Uro Dyna-CT in endourology - the new frontier.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

B MeisterDepartment of Urology, University Medical Center Mannheim, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany, benjamin.meister@umm.de.
M C Rassweiler
C Weiß
A Häcker
M Ritter
Heidelberg University · DEUniversity Hospital Heidelberg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeResidual calculi after stone therapy need to be treated if they are clinically significant, mainly depending on the size of the calculi. There are different ways to detect and measure the size of residual calculi as for example KUB or computed tomography. The Uro Dyna-CT (Siemens Healthcare solutions, Erlangen, Germany) allows cross-sectional imaging and 3D reconstructions during endourological interventions. In this ex vivo study, we investigate the accuracy of imaging residual calculi with the Uro Dyna-CT. MATERIALS AND

methodsTwenty-seven artificial stones (plaster of Paris) were scanned with the Uro Dyna-CT by a special urolithiasis protocol and post-image processing with 3D-reconstruction and cross-sectional imaging was performed. The major diameter of each stone was measured at the dedicated workstation by one investigator. The same stones were measured randomized with a digital caliper (real size). Finally, the two measurements were compared. The paired t test, Pearson's correlation coefficient, the F Test, a reference area for differences, the intraclass correlation coefficient, the Maloney-Rastogi test and the Bland-Altman analysis were used for statistical analyses.

resultsThe range of stone sizes was 3-5 mm. We did not find significant differences in the size of the stones measured with the Uro Dyna-CT and the digital caliper (paired t test p = 0.3597) and we showed a good correlation between the two measuring methods (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.4465; p = 0.0088).

conclusionRenal calculi can be measured highly accurately with the Uro Dyna-CT. Whether this technique will lead to less residual fragments after stone treatment needs to be shown in further studies.

Indexed as

Imaging, Three-DimensionalTomography, X-Ray ComputedHumansModels, BiologicalReproducibility of ResultsUrolithiasis

Identifiers

PMID25164043
OpenAlexW2066381522

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.